Literature DB >> 20001567

Changing the dose metric for inhalation toxicity studies: short-term study in rats with engineered aerosolized amorphous silica nanoparticles.

Christie M Sayes1, Kenneth L Reed, Kyle P Glover, Keith A Swain, Michele L Ostraat, E Maria Donner, David B Warheit.   

Abstract

Inhalation toxicity and exposure assessment studies for nonfibrous particulates have traditionally been conducted using particle mass measurements as the preferred dose metric (i.e., mg or microg/m(3)). However, currently there is a debate regarding the appropriate dose metric for nanoparticle exposure assessment studies in the workplace. The objectives of this study were to characterize aerosol exposures and toxicity in rats of freshly generated amorphous silica (AS) nanoparticles using particle number dose metrics (3.7 x 10(7) or 1.8 x 10(8) particles/cm(3)) for 1- or 3-day exposures. In addition, the role of particle size (d(50) = 37 or 83 nm) on pulmonary toxicity and genotoxicity endpoints was assessed at several postexposure time points. A nanoparticle reactor capable of producing, de novo synthesized, aerosolized amorphous silica nanoparticles for inhalation toxicity studies was developed for this study. SiO(2) aerosol nanoparticle synthesis occurred via thermal decomposition of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). The reactor was designed to produce aerosolized nanoparticles at two different particle size ranges, namely d(50) = approximately 30 nm and d(50) = approximately 80 nm; at particle concentrations ranging from 10(7) to 10(8) particles/cm(3). AS particle aerosol concentrations were consistently generated by the reactor. One- or 3-day aerosol exposures produced no significant pulmonary inflammatory, genotoxic, or adverse lung histopathological effects in rats exposed to very high particle numbers corresponding to a range of mass concentrations (1.8 or 86 mg/m(3)). Although the present study was a short-term effort, the methodology described herein can be utilized for longer-term inhalation toxicity studies in rats such as 28-day or 90-day studies. The expansion of the concept to subchronic studies is practical, due, in part, to the consistency of the nanoparticle generation method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20001567     DOI: 10.3109/08958370903359992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  16 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and autophagy dysfunction induced by different sizes of silica particles in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells.

Authors:  Qiuling Li; Hejing Hu; Lizhen Jiang; Yang Zou; Junchao Duan; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Regulatory role of miR-18a to CCN2 by TGF-β1 signaling pathway in pulmonary injury induced by nano-SiO2.

Authors:  Hong Yang; Wenchao Li; Yingjian Zhang; Mingyue Li; Ying Gao; Canshan Lao; Bing Shi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Biocompatibility assessment of Si-based nano- and micro-particles.

Authors:  Hamsa Jaganathan; Biana Godin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Altered microRNA expression profiles in lung damage induced by nanosized SiO2.

Authors:  Hong Yang; Yingjian Zhang; Wenchao Li; Canshan Lao; Mingyue Li; Yi Zheng
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  Current studies into the genotoxic effects of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Cheng-Teng Ng; Jasmine J Li; Boon-Huat Bay; Lin-Yue Lanry Yung
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-21

Review 6.  The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity.

Authors:  Dorota Napierska; Leen C J Thomassen; Dominique Lison; Johan A Martens; Peter H Hoet
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 9.400

7.  Potential for inhalation exposure to engineered nanoparticles from nanotechnology-based cosmetic powders.

Authors:  Yevgen Nazarenko; Huajun Zhen; Taewon Han; Paul J Lioy; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  A Safer Formulation Concept for Flame-Generated Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Samuel Gass; Joel M Cohen; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Georgios A Sotiriou; Sotiris E Pratsinis; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.198

9.  Genotoxicity and Gene Expression in the Rat Lung Tissue following Instillation and Inhalation of Different Variants of Amorphous Silica Nanomaterials (aSiO2 NM).

Authors:  Fátima Brandão; Carla Costa; Maria João Bessa; Elise Dumortier; Florence Debacq-Chainiaux; Roland Hubaux; Michel Salmon; Julie Laloy; Miruna S Stan; Anca Hermenean; Sami Gharbia; Anca Dinischiotu; Anne Bannuscher; Bryan Hellack; Andrea Haase; Sónia Fraga; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Acute toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in intravenously exposed ICR mice.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Yang Li; Wen Wang; Minghua Jin; Zhongjun Du; Yanbo Li; Junchao Duan; Yongbo Yu; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.