Literature DB >> 20001111

Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonist effects on response likelihood and duration.

Won Yung Choi1, Cecile Morvan, Peter D Balsam, Jon C Horvitz.   

Abstract

Experimentally induced and parkinsonian disruptions in dopamine (DA) transmission are associated with motor abnormalities that include a reduced likelihood of behavioral response initiation and an increased duration of executed responses. Here we investigated the dopamine receptor subtypes involved in regulating these two aspects of behavior. We examined the effects of D1 family (D1/D5) antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390; 0, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.16 mg/kg) and D2/D3 antagonist 3,5-dichloro-N-(1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-ylmethyl)-2-hydroxy-6-methoxybenzamide (+)-tartrate salt (raclopride; 0, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg) on the likelihood and duration of a cued Pavlovian approach and a cued operant lever-press response. While the high doses of the D1 and D2 antagonists produced similar levels of overall locomotor suppression, only the D2 antagonist increased the duration of time that animals' heads remained in the food compartment during both Pavlovian and operant task performance. In contrast, D1 antagonist SCH23390 decreased the proportion of trials in which animals executed both the Pavlovian approach and operant lever-press, while raclopride did not. The results suggest that D2 receptor blockade preferentially increases response duration, and, under the simple discrete-trial procedures employed here, D1 receptor blockade preferential reduces Pavlovian and operant response likelihood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20001111      PMCID: PMC2821424          DOI: 10.1037/a0017702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  40 in total

1.  Interaction of raclopride and preparatory interval effects on simple reaction time performance.

Authors:  Christopher J Macdonald; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Haloperidol, raclopride, and eticlopride induce microcatalepsy during operant performance in rats, but clozapine and SCH 23390 do not.

Authors:  S C Fowler; J R Liou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Blockade of subthalamic dopamine D1 receptors elicits akinesia in rats.

Authors:  W Hauber
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-12-21       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?

Authors:  K C Berridge; T E Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-12

Review 5.  Dopamine receptors: from structure to function.

Authors:  C Missale; S R Nash; S W Robinson; M Jaber; M G Caron
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  The serial reaction time task in the rat: effects of D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Dorothée Domenger; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Differential perikaryal localization in rats of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors on striatal projection neuron types identified by retrograde labeling.

Authors:  Yun-Ping Deng; Wan-Long Lei; Anton Reiner
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.052

Review 8.  Dopamine D1-like receptors and reward-related incentive learning.

Authors:  R J Beninger; R Miller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine release is necessary and sufficient to promote the behavioral response to reward-predictive cues.

Authors:  S M Nicola; S A Taha; S W Kim; H L Fields
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Extended habit training reduces dopamine mediation of appetitive response expression.

Authors:  Won Yung Choi; Peter D Balsam; Jon C Horvitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of cortical and striatal dopamine D1 receptor blockade on cued versus noncued behavioral responses.

Authors:  Won Yung Choi; Cecile Morvan Campbell; Peter D Balsam; Jon C Horvitz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  The role of the nucleus accumbens in learned approach behavior diminishes with training.

Authors:  Veronica Dobrovitsky; Mark O West; Jon C Horvitz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Acute administration of dopaminergic drugs has differential effects on locomotion in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  T D Irons; P E Kelly; D L Hunter; R C Macphail; S Padilla
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Effects of systemic or nucleus accumbens-directed dopamine D1 receptor antagonism on sucrose seeking in rats.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Grimm; John H Harkness; Christine Ratliff; Jesse Barnes; Kindsey North; Stefan Collins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Dissociable hippocampal and amygdalar D1-like receptor contribution to discriminated Pavlovian conditioned approach learning.

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Curtis Ryals
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Decreasing Striatopallidal Pathway Function Enhances Motivation by Energizing the Initiation of Goal-Directed Action.

Authors:  Fernanda Carvalho Poyraz; Eva Holzner; Matthew R Bailey; Jozsef Meszaros; Lindsay Kenney; Mazen A Kheirbek; Peter D Balsam; Christoph Kellendonk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A model of reward- and effort-based optimal decision making and motor control.

Authors:  Lionel Rigoux; Emmanuel Guigon
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  What Is the Relationship between Dopamine and Effort?

Authors:  Mark E Walton; Sebastien Bouret
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 13.837

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.