Literature DB >> 20000549

Sulfide remediation by pulsed injection of nitrate into a low temperature Canadian heavy oil reservoir.

Gerrit Voordouw1, Aleksandr A Grigoryan, Adewale Lambo, Shiping Lin, Hyung Soo Park, Thomas R Jack, Dennis Coombe, Bill Clay, Frank Zhang, Ryan Ertmoed, Kirk Miner, Joseph J Arensdorf.   

Abstract

Sulfide formation by oil field sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can be diminished by the injection of nitrate, stimulating the growth of nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB). We monitored the field-wide injection of nitrate into a low temperature (approximately 30 degrees C) oil reservoir in western Canada by determining aqueous concentrations of sulfide, sulfate, nitrate, and nitrite, as well as the activities of NRB in water samples from 3 water plants, 2 injection wells, and 15 production wells over 2 years. The injection water had a low sulfate concentration (approximately 1 mM). Nitrate (2.4 mM, 150 ppm) was added at the water plants. Its subsequent distribution to the injection wells gave losses of 5-15% in the pipeline system, indicating that most was injected. Continuous nitrate injection lowered the total aqueous sulfide output of the production wells by 70% in the first five weeks, followed by recovery. Batchwise treatment of a limited section of the reservoir with high nitrate eliminated sulfide from one production well with nitrate breakthrough. Subsequent, field-wide treatment with week-long pulses of 14 mM nitrate gave breakthrough at an additional production well. However, this trend was reversed when injection with a constant dose of 2.4 mM (150 ppm) was resumed. The results are explained by assuming growth of SRB near the injection wellbore due to sulfate limitation. Injection of a constant nitrate dose inhibits these SRB initially. However, because of the constant, low temperature of the reservoir, SRB eventually grow back in a zone further removed from the injection wellbore. The resulting zonation (NRB closest to and SRB further away from the injection wellbore) can be broken by batch-wise increases in the concentration of injected nitrate, allowing it to re-enter the SRB-dominated zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20000549     DOI: 10.1021/es902211j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  30 in total

1.  Anaerobic Benzene Mineralization by Nitrate-Reducing and Sulfate-Reducing Microbial Consortia Enriched From the Same Site: Comparison of Community Composition and Degradation Characteristics.

Authors:  Andreas H Keller; Sabine Kleinsteuber; Carsten Vogt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Use of Acetate, Propionate, and Butyrate for Reduction of Nitrate and Sulfate and Methanogenesis in Microcosms and Bioreactors Simulating an Oil Reservoir.

Authors:  Chuan Chen; Yin Shen; Dongshan An; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Ammonium concentrations in produced waters from a mesothermic oil field subjected to nitrate injection decrease through formation of denitrifying biomass and anammox activity.

Authors:  Sabrina L Cornish Shartau; Marcy Yurkiw; Shiping Lin; Aleksandr A Grigoryan; Adewale Lambo; Hyung-Soo Park; Bart P Lomans; Erwin van der Biezen; Mike S M Jetten; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of Thermophilic Nitrate Reduction on Sulfide Production in High Temperature Oil Reservoir Samples.

Authors:  Gloria N Okpala; Chuan Chen; Tekle Fida; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Acetate production from oil under sulfate-reducing conditions in bioreactors injected with sulfate and nitrate.

Authors:  Cameron M Callbeck; Akhil Agrawal; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Implications of Limited Thermophilicity of Nitrite Reduction for Control of Sulfide Production in Oil Reservoirs.

Authors:  Tekle Tafese Fida; Chuan Chen; Gloria Okpala; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of microbial communities involved in souring and corrosion in offshore and onshore oil production facilities in Nigeria.

Authors:  Chuma Okoro; Seun Smith; Leo Chiejina; Rhea Lumactud; Dongshan An; Hyung Soo Park; Johanna Voordouw; Bart P Lomans; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  In situ detection of anaerobic alkane metabolites in subsurface environments.

Authors:  Akhil Agrawal; Lisa M Gieg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Metagenomics of hydrocarbon resource environments indicates aerobic taxa and genes to be unexpectedly common.

Authors:  Dongshan An; Sean M Caffrey; Jung Soh; Akhil Agrawal; Damon Brown; Karen Budwill; Xiaoli Dong; Peter F Dunfield; Julia Foght; Lisa M Gieg; Steven J Hallam; Niels W Hanson; Zhiguo He; Thomas R Jack; Jonathan Klassen; Kishori M Konwar; Eugene Kuatsjah; Carmen Li; Steve Larter; Verlyn Leopatra; Camilla L Nesbø; Thomas Oldenburg; Antoine P Pagé; Esther Ramos-Padron; Fauziah F Rochman; Alireeza Saidi-Mehrabad; Christoph W Sensen; Payal Sipahimalani; Young C Song; Sandra Wilson; Gregor Wolbring; Man-Ling Wong; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Inhibition of microbial sulfate reduction in a flow-through column system by (per)chlorate treatment.

Authors:  Anna Engelbrektson; Christopher G Hubbard; Lauren M Tom; Aaron Boussina; Yong T Jin; Hayden Wong; Yvette M Piceno; Hans K Carlson; Mark E Conrad; Gary Anderson; John D Coates
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.