Literature DB >> 19999683

Investigating the effects of San Francisco's Treatment on Demand Initiative on a publicly-funded substance abuse treatment system: a time series analysis.

Clare Sears1, Thomas Davis, Joseph Guydish, Alice Gleghorn.   

Abstract

This study investigated effects of San Francisco's Treatment on Demand Initiative, which was designed to increase substance abuse treatment capacity, on the host treatment system. Secondary data on substance abuse treatment admissions, from 1995 through 2000, were obtained from the Department of Public Health, Community Substance Abuse Services, San Francisco, California. Data on 73,988 admissions were retained and grouped by week of admission. Time series analysis was used to assess the effects of time and treatment on demand (independent variables) on weekly number of admissions, sociodemographic characteristics and types of treatment received (dependent variables). As a function of treatment on demand, the number of weekly new admissions significantly increased. Standard outpatient treatment and comprehensive care admissions constituted greater proportions of admissions after treatment on demand. Persons with a primary heroin, cocaine or alcohol problem constituted greater proportions of admissions, and first-time treatment clients constituted a smaller proportion of admissions. Findings suggest that a capacity expansion initiative can increase system wide admissions and redistribute admissions among modalities towards more comprehensive care treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19999683      PMCID: PMC2988684          DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2009.10400540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs        ISSN: 0279-1072


  26 in total

1.  Drug abuse treatment on demand in San Francisco: preliminary findings.

Authors:  J Guydish; L Moore; A Gleghorn; T Davis; C Sears; J Harcourt
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec

2.  Does centralized intake improve drug abuse treatment outcomes?

Authors:  J Guydish; W J Woods; T Davis; A Bostrom; Y Frazier
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2001-06

3.  The early effects of Ontario's Administrative Driver's Licence Suspension law on driver fatalities with a BAC > 80 mg%.

Authors:  Robert E Mann; Reginald G Smart; Gina Stoduto; Douglas Beirness; Robert Lamble; Evelyn Vingilis
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 May-Jun

4.  Short-term alcohol and drug treatment outcomes predict long-term outcome.

Authors:  Constance Weisner; G Thomas Ray; Jennifer R Mertens; Derek D Satre; Charles Moore
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Closure of an open drug scene--a case register-based analysis of the impact on the demand for methadone maintenance treatment.

Authors:  L Falcato; R Stohler; K M Dürsteler-Mac Farland; A Eichenberger; D Eich; W Rössler
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Access to substance abuse treatment services under the Oregon Health Plan.

Authors:  D D Deck; B H McFarland; J M Titus; K E Laws; R M Gabriel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts.

Authors:  Y I Hser; V Hoffman; C E Grella; M D Anglin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-05

8.  Effect of alcoholism treatment on cirrhosis mortality: a 20-year multivariate time series analysis.

Authors:  H D Holder; R N Parker
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1992-09

9.  Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Cheryl Teruya; Elizabeth A Evans; Douglas Longshore; Christine Grella; David Farabee
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2003-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Access to drug abuse treatment under Treatment on Demand policy in San Francisco.

Authors:  James L Sorensen; Joseph Guydish; Pamela Zilavy; Thomas B Davis; Alice Gleghorn; Marvin Jacoby; Clare Sears
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  Reducing appointment no-shows: going from theory to practice.

Authors:  Todd Molfenter
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.164

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.