Literature DB >> 19998582

Bioequivalence study of two minocycline capsule formulations in healthy volunteers.

Effi Setiawati1, Asri Purnomo, Siti Hawa Deniati, Danang Agung Yunaidi, Lucia Rat Handayani, Gunawan Harinato, Iwan Dwi Santoso.   

Abstract

The bioequivalence of two capsule formulations containing 100 mg minocycline was assessed in 12 healthy adult male and female volunteers in a crossover, randomized, single-blind study. The participating volunteers were required to fast overnight and in the next morning and were given orally one capsule of the test drug (Acnez) or one capsule of the reference drug. Blood samples were drawn immediately before taking the drug (control), and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after drug administration. One week after the first drug administration (washout period), the procedure was repeated using the alternate drug. Plasma concentrations of the drug were determined by high performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed in this study were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 h (AUC(t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(inf)), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (C(max)), time needed to achieve the peak plasma concentration (t(max)), and the elimination half life (t1/2). The mean AUC(t), AUC(inf), C(max), and t were 18038.55 ng x h x mL(-1), 19648.21 ng x h x mL(-1), 1076.01 ng x mL(-1), and 17.33 h, respectively, for the test drug and 17979.43 ng x h x mL(-1), 19639.78 ng x h x mL(-1), 1095.97 ng x mL(-1), and 16.44 h, respectively, for the reference drug. The median (range) of t(max) of the test drug and reference drug were 2.0 (1.0-4.0) h and 2.0 (0.67-4.0) h, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of the test drug/the reference drug for AUC(t), AUC(inf), and C(max) were 98.27% 98.30%, and 97.31%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 89.26-108.19% for AUC(t), 89.95-107.41% for AUC(inf), and 89.55-105.73% for C(max). Using Wilcoxon matched-pairs test on the original data, there was no statistically significant difference found between the test and the reference drug products for t(max), values. It can be concluded that the two minocycline capsules (test drug and reference drug) are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19998582     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  2 in total

1.  Minocycline, a putative neuroprotectant, co-administered with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in a xenograft model of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lauren E Himmel; Maryam B Lustberg; A Courtney DeVries; Ming Poi; Ching-Shih Chen; Samuel K Kulp
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-08-21

2.  Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Oral and Intravenous Administration of Omadacycline to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Haiying Sun; Lillian Ting; Surendra Machineni; Jens Praestgaard; Andreas Kuemmell; Daniel S Stein; Gangadhar Sunkara; Steven J Kovacs; Stephen Villano; S Ken Tanaka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.