Literature DB >> 19998476

Genetic modification of pigs as organ donors for xenotransplantation.

Nikolai Klymiuk1, Bernhard Aigner, Gottfried Brem, Eckhard Wolf.   

Abstract

Transgenic pigs are promising donor organisms for xenotransplantation as they share many anatomical and physiological characteristics with humans. The most profound barrier to pig-to-primate xenotransplantation is the rejection of the grafted organ by a cascade of immune mechanisms commonly referred to as hyperacute rejection (HAR), acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR), immune cell-mediated rejection, and chronic rejection. Various strategies for the genetic modification of pigs facilitate tailoring them to be donors for organ transplantation. Genetically modified pigs lacking alpha-1,3-Gal epitopes, the major xenoantigens triggering HAR of pig-to-primate xenografts, are considered to be the basis for further genetic modifications that can address other rejection mechanisms and incompatibilities between the porcine and primate blood coagulation systems. These modifications include expression of human complement regulatory proteins, CD39, endothelial protein C receptor, heme oxygenase 1, thrombomodulin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor as well as modulators of the cellular immune system such as human TNF alpha-related apoptosis inducing ligand, HLA-E/beta-2-microglobulin, and CTLA-4Ig. In addition, transgenic strategies have been developed to reduce the potential risk of infections by endogenous porcine retroviruses. The protective efficacy of all these strategies is strictly dependent on a sufficiently high expression level of the respective factors with the required spatial distribution. This review provides an overview of the transgenic approaches that have been used to generate donor pigs for xenotransplantation, as well as their biological effects in in vitro tests and in preclinical transplantation studies. A future challenge will be to combine the most important and efficient genetic modifications in multi-transgenic pigs for clinical xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19998476     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.21127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  50 in total

Review 1.  Current status of pig heart xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Muhammad M Mohiuddin; Bruno Reichart; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 2.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 3.  Concise review: pancreas regeneration: recent advances and perspectives.

Authors:  Philippe A Lysy; Gordon C Weir; Susan Bonner-Weir
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Expression of human CD46 has no effect on porcine circovirus type 2 infection and shedding in the experimental pig model.

Authors:  Michelle Hemann; Hui-Gang Shen; Nathan M Beach; Xiang-Jin Meng; Patrick G Halbur; Tanja Opriessnig
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  New Insights into Diabetes Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Philippe A Lysy; Elisa Corritore; Etienne M Sokal
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Overcoming Coagulation Dysregulation in Pig Solid Organ Transplantation in Nonhuman Primates: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Liaoran Wang; David K C Cooper; Lars Burdorf; Yi Wang; Hayato Iwase
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Genetically modified pigs for biomedical research.

Authors:  Yonglun Luo; Lin Lin; Lars Bolund; Thomas G Jensen; Charlotte Brandt Sørensen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 8.  New concepts of immune modulation in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Vikas Satyananda; Hidetaka Hara; Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Carol Phelps; David Ayares; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Generation of GTKO Diannan Miniature Pig Expressing Human Complementary Regulator Proteins hCD55 and hCD59 via T2A Peptide-Based Bicistronic Vectors and SCNT.

Authors:  Fengjuan Liu; Jinji Liu; Zaimei Yuan; Yubo Qing; Honghui Li; Kaixiang Xu; Wanyun Zhu; Heng Zhao; Baoyu Jia; Weirong Pan; Jianxiong Guo; Xuezeng Zhang; Wenmin Cheng; Wei Wang; Hong-Ye Zhao; Hong-Jiang Wei
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning.

Authors:  Zicong Li; Junsong Shi; Dewu Liu; Rong Zhou; Haiyu Zeng; Xiu Zhou; Ranbiao Mai; Shaofen Zeng; Lvhua Luo; Wanxian Yu; Shouquan Zhang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.