Literature DB >> 1999818

The plain radiograph in ophthalmology: a wasteful and potentially dangerous anachronism.

I F Moseley1.   

Abstract

The indications for 822 consecutive referrals for skull radiography were prospectively studied in a large eye hospital over a one year period. In 85.9% of patients the results were normal, and in 89% of the remainder they had no positive effects on management; all patients in whom a 'beneficial' effect could be identified would have been more appropriately investigated by other means. Fourteen of 25 patients whose skull radiographs were normal were shown by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to have orbital or intracranial lesions. Views of the optic canals, orbits or paranasal sinuses were also requested in 336 patients. With appropriate use of alternative imaging methods, no patient's treatment would have been adversely affected if none of the skull radiographs had been obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1999818      PMCID: PMC1293091          DOI: 10.1177/014107689108400207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  9 in total

1.  A survey of cost awareness among hospital medical staff.

Authors:  D Wynick; J H Jessop
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1985-02

2.  Diagnostic value of 'optic foramen views': experience from an eye hospital.

Authors:  I Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Long term effects of the introduction of noninvasive investigations in neuroradiology. Part 1: Overall trends.

Authors:  I F Moseley
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  [The value of anamnestic and clinical data and of findings obtained via medical apparatus in brain tumour diagnosis (author's transl)].

Authors:  A Hillemacher
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 0.752

5.  The value of plain skull X-rays in the diagnosis of intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  J M Caillé; M Dautheribes; D Guibert-Tranier; J Piton; R Salamon
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.447

6.  The need for skull radiography in patients presenting for CT.

Authors:  B M Tress
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Radiological evaluation of orbital metastases, with emphasis on computed tomography.

Authors:  J R Hesselink; K R Davis; A L Weber; J M Davis; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Craniopharyngioma in children and adults. Correlations between radiological and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  R Sorva; J Jääskinen; O Heiskanen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Long term effects of the introduction of noninvasive investigations in neuroradiology. Part 2: Effects on management of individual patients.

Authors:  I Moseley
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Neuro-ophthalmology: examination and investigation.

Authors:  C J Lueck; D F Gilmour; G G McIlwaine
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  [Imaging of paranasal sinuses today].

Authors:  F Dammann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease.

Authors:  Florian Dammann; Friedrich Bootz; Mathias Cohnen; Stefan Hassfeld; Marcos Tatagiba; Sabrina Kösling
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Investigation of visual loss: neuro-ophthalmology from a neurologist's perspective.

Authors:  C J Lueck
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  Imaging the adult brain.

Authors:  I Moseley
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.154

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.