Charlotte L Edwardson1, Trish Gorely. 1. Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom. C.L.Edwardson2@lboro.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Researchers have begun to investigate the issue of epoch length on children's physical activity using small sample sizes, and to date, no studies have been conducted in adolescents. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different epoch lengths (5, 15, 30, and 60 s) on derived levels of physical activity in both a child and an adolescent sample. METHODS: Three hundred and eleven children age 7-11 yr and 234 adolescents age 12-16 yr were asked to wear an accelerometer during waking hours for 7 d. The epoch was set at 5 s, and when data were downloaded, the activity counts were then reintegrated into 15-, 30-, and 60-s epochs. RESULTS: A significant epoch effect was seen for time spent in vigorous physical activity, light physical activity, and rest in the child and adolescent samples and moderate-to-vigorous and moderate physical activities in the child sample only. The Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable agreement on moderate-to-vigorous, moderate, vigorous, and light physical activities and rest between 5- and 15-, 5- and 30-, and 30- and 60-s epochs in the child sample and between 5- and 15-, 5- and 30-, and 15- and 30-s epochs in the adolescent sample. CONCLUSIONS: A short epoch is strongly recommended for child and adolescent samples to obtain a "real" picture of young people's physical activity behavior and to prevent accumulation of counts reflecting the average activity level when longer epochs are used. Activity prevalence studies using epoch lengths of 5 and 60 s in a child or an adolescent sample should not be compared nor should 15- and 60- and 30- and 60-s epochs in an adolescent sample.
BACKGROUND: Researchers have begun to investigate the issue of epoch length on children's physical activity using small sample sizes, and to date, no studies have been conducted in adolescents. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different epoch lengths (5, 15, 30, and 60 s) on derived levels of physical activity in both a child and an adolescent sample. METHODS: Three hundred and eleven children age 7-11 yr and 234 adolescents age 12-16 yr were asked to wear an accelerometer during waking hours for 7 d. The epoch was set at 5 s, and when data were downloaded, the activity counts were then reintegrated into 15-, 30-, and 60-s epochs. RESULTS: A significant epoch effect was seen for time spent in vigorous physical activity, light physical activity, and rest in the child and adolescent samples and moderate-to-vigorous and moderate physical activities in the child sample only. The Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable agreement on moderate-to-vigorous, moderate, vigorous, and light physical activities and rest between 5- and 15-, 5- and 30-, and 30- and 60-s epochs in the child sample and between 5- and 15-, 5- and 30-, and 15- and 30-s epochs in the adolescent sample. CONCLUSIONS: A short epoch is strongly recommended for child and adolescent samples to obtain a "real" picture of young people's physical activity behavior and to prevent accumulation of counts reflecting the average activity level when longer epochs are used. Activity prevalence studies using epoch lengths of 5 and 60 s in a child or an adolescent sample should not be compared nor should 15- and 60- and 30- and 60-s epochs in an adolescent sample.
Authors: Katrina D DuBose; Andrew J McKune; Patricia Brophy; Gabriel Geyer; Robert C Hickner Journal: Pediatr Exerc Sci Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Christine A Schaefer; Claudio R Nigg; James O Hill; Lois A Brink; Raymond C Browning Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kelley Pettee Gabriel; James J McClain; Kendra K Schmid; Kristi L Storti; Robin R High; Darcy A Underwood; Lewis H Kuller; Andrea M Kriska Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: D Yerrakalva; A J Cooper; K Westgate; K T Khaw; N J Wareham; S Brage; S J Griffin; K Wijndaele Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196