Literature DB >> 19996973

N-acetyltransferase 2, exposure to aromatic and heterocyclic amines, and receptor-defined breast cancer.

Sylvia Rabstein1, Thomas Brüning, Volker Harth, Hans-Peter Fischer, Susanne Haas, Tobias Weiss, Anne Spickenheuer, Christiane Pierl, Christina Justenhoven, Thomas Illig, Caren Vollmert, Christian Baisch, Yon-Dschun Ko, Ute Hamann, Hiltrud Brauch, Beate Pesch.   

Abstract

The role of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) polymorphism in breast cancer is still unclear. We explored the associations between potential sources of exposure to aromatic and heterocyclic amines (AHA), acetylation status and receptor-defined breast cancer in 1020 incident cases and 1047 population controls of the German GENICA study. Acetylation status was assessed as slow or fast. Therefore, NAT2 haplotypes were estimated using genotype information from six NAT2 polymorphisms. Most probable haplotypes served as alleles for the deduction of NAT2 acetylation status. The risks of developing estrogen receptor alpha (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive or negative tumors were estimated for tobacco smoking, consumption of red meat, grilled food, coffee, and tea, as well as expert-rated occupational exposure to AHA with logistic regression conditional on age and adjusted for potential confounders. Joint effects of these factors and NAT2 acetylation status were investigated. Frequent consumption of grilled food and coffee showed higher risks in slow acetylators for receptor-negative tumors [grilled food: ER-: odds ratio (OR) 2.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-6.14 for regular vs. rare; coffee: ER-: OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.22-5.33 for >or=4 vs. 0 cups/day]. We observed slightly higher risks for never smokers that are fast acetylators for receptor-positive tumors compared with slow acetylators (ER-: OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.00-1.73). Our results support differing risk patterns for receptor-defined breast cancer. However, the modifying role of NAT2 for receptor-defined breast cancer is difficult to interpret in the light of complex mixtures of exposure to AHA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19996973     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328333fbb7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tea and cancer prevention: epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Jian-Min Yuan; Canlan Sun; Lesley M Butler
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 2.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Well-done meat intake and meat-derived mutagen exposures in relation to breast cancer risk: the Nashville Breast Health Study.

Authors:  Zhenming Fu; Sandra L Deming; Alecia M Fair; Martha J Shrubsole; Debra M Wujcik; Xiao-Ou Shu; Mark Kelley; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Comparison between acetylator phenotype and genotype polymorphism of n-acetyltransferase-2 in tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  S V Rana; R P Ola; Sanjeev K Sharma; S K Arora; S K Sinha; P Pandhi; K Singh
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing genes, intakes of heterocyclic amines and red meat, and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Hae-Jeung Lee; Kana Wu; David G Cox; David Hunter; Susan E Hankinson; Walter C Willett; Rashmi Sinha; Eunyoung Cho
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.900

6.  Active cigarette smoking and the risk of breast cancer at the level of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  Petra Kasajova; Veronika Holubekova; Andrea Mendelova; Zora Lasabova; Pavol Zubor; Erik Kudela; Kristina Biskupska-Bodova; Jan Danko
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-23

7.  Environmental exposures and breast cancer risk in the context of underlying susceptibility: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  Nur Zeinomar; Sabine Oskar; Rebecca D Kehm; Shamin Sahebzeda; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 8.  Food Processing and the Mediterranean Diet.

Authors:  Richard Hoffman; Mariette Gerber
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk in relation to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a case-control study in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Nishino; Yuko Minami; Masaaki Kawai; Kayoko Fukamachi; Ikuro Sato; Noriaki Ohuchi; Yoichiro Kakugawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-02-03

Review 10.  Occupational Chemical Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk According to Hormone Receptor Status: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Veruscka Leso; Maria Luigia Ercolano; Dante Luigi Cioffi; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.