Literature DB >> 19996929

Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted corneal endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

Yanny Y Y Cheng1, Jan S A G Schouten, Nayyirih G Tahzib, Robert-Jan Wijdh, Elisabeth Pels, Hugo van Cleynenbreugel, Catharina A Eggink, Wilhelmina J Rijneveld, Rudy M M A Nuijts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted endothelial keratoplasty (FLEK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with corneal endothelial disease.
METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical trial of 80 eyes of 80 patients with corneal endothelial disease were randomized to FLEK or PK. Clinical outcomes (astigmatism and visual acuity) and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: At 12 months, the percentage of eyes with a refractive astigmatism less than or equal to 3 diopters was higher in the FLEK group in comparison with the PK group (86.2% vs. 51.3%, P=0.004). The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuity was 20/70+/-2 lines in the FLEK group and 20/44+/-2 lines in the PK group (P<0.001), but the gain in the best corrected visual acuity between the two groups was not significantly different. The endothelial cell loss in the FLEK and PK group was 65+/-12% and 23+/-15% (P<0.001). The most common postoperative complication in the FLEK group was graft dislocation (27.8%). Wound healing related problems occurred in six eyes (15%) in the PK group and in none of the FLEK eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: FLEK effectively reduces postoperative astigmatism and results in an absence of wound healing related problems in patients with endothelial disease. However, visual acuity is lower as compared with conventional PK, and the high level of endothelial cell loss warrants a modification of the insertion technique of the endothelial graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19996929     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181bc419c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Perspectives of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Perspectives of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. In search of the perfect lamella].

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Shreya S Prabhu; Rola Kaakeh; Alan Sugar; Dean G Smith; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Ophthalmic transplantology: anterior segment of the eye - part I.

Authors:  Małgorzata Nita; Barbara Strzałka-Mrozik; Andrzej Grzybowski; Wanda Romaniuk; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-05

5.  Fibrocellular contraction of a lamellar posterior corneal graft.

Authors:  Jesper Hjortdal; Anders Ivarsen; Steffen Heegaard
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-28

Review 6.  Graft rejection rate and graft failure rate of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) vs lamellar procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zarique Z Akanda; Abdul Naeem; Elizabeth Russell; Jillian Belrose; Francie F Si; William G Hodge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Xue Wang; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-14

8.  Posterior lamellar graft preparation: a prospective review from an eye bank on current and future aspects.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Gianni Salvalaio; Alessandro Ruzza; Davide Camposampiero; Carlo Griffoni; Alfonso Zampini; Diego Ponzin; Stefano Ferrari
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Jesper Hjortdal; Esben Nielsen; Anders Vestergaard; Anders Søndergaard
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2012-05-03

10.  Effect of 60 kHz and 150 kHz Femtosecond Lasers on Corneal Stromal Bed Surfaces: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Cristina Monterosso; Alessandro Galan; Elisabetta Böhm; Alfonso Zampini; Mohit Parekh; Luigi Caretti
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.