BACKGROUND: An accurate monitoring would help understanding the fate of islet grafts after transplantation. METHODS: This work assessed the feasibility of needle biopsy monitoring after intraportal islet transplantation (n=16), and islet graft morphology was studied with the addition of autopsy samples (n=2). Pancreas autopsy samples from two nondiabetic individuals were used as control. RESULTS: Islet tissue was found in five needle samples (31%). Sampling success was related to size (100% sampling for the four biopsies of 1.8 cm in length or higher, P<or=0.01). Mild liver abnormalities included localized steatosis (n=8), mild nodular regenerative hyperplasia and mild portal venopathy (n=3), and hepatocyte swelling (n=2). Endocrine cell composition and distribution were similar between islet grafts and normal islets within the native pancreas. There was no or minimal immune cell infiltrate in patients on and off exogenous insulin, including two patients with ongoing negative metabolic events (increasing HbA1c or insulin requirement). The infiltrate was mainly composed of CD4- and CD8-positive cells. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that needle biopsy is feasible after clinical islet transplantation but with a limited practical value because of its low islet sampling rate using current sampling and analysis methods. Both biopsy and autopsy samples demonstrated the well-preserved islet endocrine composition after transplantation and the presence of focal areas of steatosis. Islet grafts showed no or minimal immune cell infiltration, even in the case of ongoing islet loss. On the basis of the findings, possible reasons for allograft islet loss are discussed.
BACKGROUND: An accurate monitoring would help understanding the fate of islet grafts after transplantation. METHODS: This work assessed the feasibility of needle biopsy monitoring after intraportal islet transplantation (n=16), and islet graft morphology was studied with the addition of autopsy samples (n=2). Pancreas autopsy samples from two nondiabetic individuals were used as control. RESULTS: Islet tissue was found in five needle samples (31%). Sampling success was related to size (100% sampling for the four biopsies of 1.8 cm in length or higher, P<or=0.01). Mild liver abnormalities included localized steatosis (n=8), mild nodular regenerative hyperplasia and mild portal venopathy (n=3), and hepatocyte swelling (n=2). Endocrine cell composition and distribution were similar between islet grafts and normal islets within the native pancreas. There was no or minimal immune cell infiltrate in patients on and off exogenous insulin, including two patients with ongoing negative metabolic events (increasing HbA1c or insulin requirement). The infiltrate was mainly composed of CD4- and CD8-positive cells. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that needle biopsy is feasible after clinical islet transplantation but with a limited practical value because of its low islet sampling rate using current sampling and analysis methods. Both biopsy and autopsy samples demonstrated the well-preserved islet endocrine composition after transplantation and the presence of focal areas of steatosis. Islet grafts showed no or minimal immune cell infiltration, even in the case of ongoing islet loss. On the basis of the findings, possible reasons for allograft islet loss are discussed.
Authors: Takayuki Tanaka; Minoru Fujita; Rita Bottino; Jon D Piganelli; Kevin McGrath; Jiang Li; Whayoung Lee; Hayato Iwase; Martin Wijkstrom; Suzanne Bertera; Cassandra Long; Douglas Landsittel; Ken Haruma; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Islets Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Laxminarayana Korutla; Michael R Rickels; Robert W Hu; Andrew Freas; Sanjana Reddy; Andreas Habertheuer; Joey Harmon; Varun Korutla; Chirag Ram; Ali Naji; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: L A Crowe; F Ris; S Nielles-Vallespin; P Speier; S Masson; M Armanet; P Morel; C Toso; D Bosco; T Berney; J-P Vallee Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Kumiko Isse; Andrew Lesniak; Kedar Grama; John Maier; Susan Specht; Marcela Castillo-Rama; John Lunz; Badrinath Roysam; George Michalopoulos; Anthony J Demetris Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Minoru Fujita; Kevin M McGrath; Rita Bottino; Eefje M Dons; Cassandra Long; Goutham Kumar; Burcin Ekser; Gabriel J Echeverri; Jiro Hata; Ken Haruma; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 4.064