Literature DB >> 19996649

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty.

Aneesh Srivastava1, Pratipal Singh, Ruchir Maheshwari, Mohd S Ansari, Deepak Dubey, Rakesh Kapoor, Anant Kumar, Anil Mandhani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the safety, efficacy and versatility of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP) in treatment of pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to November 2006, 185 patients (186 units; 182 with primary and 4 with secondary PUJO) underwent LPP (transperitoneal approach in 184; retroperitoneal approach in 2). A double J stent was placed antegradely in 121 (68.4%) units, cystoscopically in 50 units (28.2%), and 6 units (3.4%) were stentless. Patients were followed up clinically, with additional diuretic renogram.
RESULTS: Surgery was completed laparoscopically in 177 units, and conversion was required in 9 (4.8%) units. Pyeloplasty was dismembered in 143 units, Foley YV plasty in 26 units, and Fenger pyeloplasty in 8 units. The median estimated blood loss, operative time and hospital stay were 50 ml, 180 min and 4 days, respectively. Overall, 18 (9.6%) patients had complications. Improvements in drainage patterns of 167 out of 177 units (94.3%) were shown on a renal scan at a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 3-63 months).
CONCLUSION: LPP is a safe, effective and versatile method for treatment of PUJO, which is applicable to all age groups, even in the presence of secondary stones, crossing vessels and secondary PUJO. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19996649     DOI: 10.1159/000251182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Cem Başataç; Uğur Boylu; Fikret Fatih Önol; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.

Authors:  Fahd Khan; Kamran Ahmed; Nikiesha Lee; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Rahmi Gokhan Ekin; Orcun Celik; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-06-18

4.  Late outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single institution study with follow-up longer than 5 years.

Authors:  Tomasz Szydelko; Wojciech Apoznański; Dariusz Janczak; Wojciech Panek
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 5.  Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay.

Authors:  Angus Chin On Luk; Rajadoss Muthu Krishna Pandian; Rakesh Heer
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.