Literature DB >> 19996511

Acute recovery of oral word production following stroke: patterns of performance as predictors of recovery.

Lauren Cloutman1, Melissa Newhart, Cameron Davis, Jennifer Heidler-Gary, Argye E Hillis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairments in oral word production are common at the onset of stroke. The identification of factors that predict early recovery has important implications for identifying those at greater risk of continued impaired functioning, and the management of the patient's care following discharge. AIMS: To identify patterns of performance that are predictors of acute recovery of oral word production abilities following stroke; to identify any association between early and more chronic recovery. METHOD AND PROCEDURES: Acute stroke patients were administered oral word production tasks within 1-2 days of hospital admission, with repeat testing by 7 days; a subset of patients had repeat testing between three weeks to one year later. Performance was examined for error rate and type to identify potential predictors of early recovery. OUTCOME AND
RESULTS: The proportion of circumlocution and no response errors at initial testing were associated with the magnitude of recovery of language functioning within the first week following stroke. Patient characteristics of age and gender were found to have no influence on the degree of early recovery observed. None of the examined factors predicted late recovery. The degree of early recovery was not associated with the degree of later recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified patterns of task performance that increase our understanding of how oral word production recovers following acute stroke. The finding that the degree of early recovery does not predict the degree of later recovery is consistent with the hypothesis that early and late recovery are due to different mechanisms (restored blood flow in acute stroke, and reorganization in later recovery).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19996511      PMCID: PMC2828045          DOI: 10.3233/BEN-2009-0245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurol        ISSN: 0953-4180            Impact factor:   3.342


  22 in total

Review 1.  Hyperacute cognitive stroke syndromes.

Authors:  J M Ferro
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Elisa N Lawler; Harlan D Harris; Jean K Gordon
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Dorothee Saur; Rüdiger Lange; Annette Baumgaertner; Valeska Schraknepper; Klaus Willmes; Michel Rijntjes; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming.

Authors:  Argye E Hillis; Jonathan T Kleinman; Melissa Newhart; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca Gottesman; Peter B Barker; Eric Aldrich; Rafael Llinas; Robert Wityk; Priyanka Chaudhry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

6.  Measurement of early spontaneous recovery from aphasia with stroke.

Authors:  J Hartman
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics.

Authors:  S F Cappa; D Perani; F Grassi; S Bressi; M Alberoni; M Franceschi; V Bettinardi; S Todde; F Fazio
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Site of the ischemic penumbra as a predictor of potential for recovery of functions.

Authors:  A E Hillis; L Gold; V Kannan; L Cloutman; J T Kleinman; M Newhart; J Heidler-Gary; C Davis; E Aldrich; R Llinas; R F Gottesman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first-ever stroke: a follow-up study of 111 cases.

Authors:  G M S Nys; M J E Van Zandvoort; P L M De Kort; B P W Jansen; H B Van der Worp; L J Kappelle; E H F De Haan
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Cognitive recovery after stroke: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Hochstenbach; Rob den Otter; Theo W Mulder
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patterns of Recovery From Aphasia in the First 2 Weeks After Stroke.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Dana K Eriksson; Temre H Brandt; Sarah M Schneck; Jillian M Lucanie; Annie S Burchfield; Sara Charney; Ian A Quillen; Michael de Riesthal; Howard S Kirshner; Pélagie M Beeson; Leslie Ritter; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Aphasia Rapid Test: an NIHSS-like aphasia test.

Authors:  C Azuar; A Leger; C Arbizu; F Henry-Amar; S Chomel-Guillaume; Y Samson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Predicting language outcomes after stroke: Is structural disconnection a useful predictor?

Authors:  Thomas M H Hope; Alex P Leff; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.881

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.