Literature DB >> 1999562

Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro.

R R Seghi1, S F Rosenstiel, P Bauer.   

Abstract

Manufacturers generally quote indentation hardness values when predicting the clinical wear potential of newly introduced ceramic restoratives. The objective of this study was to determine whether in vitro two-body wear correlated well with hardness. A modified polisher was used to abrade enamel cylinders against polished disks of commercially available dental porcelains and glass. Enamel loss after four h was measured with a micrometer. Five ceramic materials were tested, and enamel abrasion rates were correlated with Knoop hardness values. Dicor and Dicor coated with a shading porcelain were found to cause the lowest wear of enamel. These rates were statistically significantly lower than those obtained with Optec, the most abrasive material. These findings may be due to microstructural differences between the materials. Knoop hardness showed poor correlation with the results of the abrasive testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1999562     DOI: 10.1177/00220345910700031301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  21 in total

1.  Clinical performance and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crowns.

Authors:  Kallaya Suputtamongkol; Kenneth J Anusavice; Chatcharee Suchatlampong; Phira Sithiamnuai; Chantana Tulapornchai
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  A comparative evaluation of wear of enamel caused by ceramics with different fusion temperatures.

Authors:  Meenakshi Khandelwal; Deshraj Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-11-01

3.  A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain.

Authors:  Yu-Seok Jung; Jae-Whang Lee; Yeon-Jo Choi; Jin-Soo Ahn; Sang-Wan Shin; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Wear behavior and abrasiveness of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics after simulated mastication.

Authors:  Ahmed Mahmoud Fouda; Osama Atta; Amr Shebl Kassem; Mohamed Desoky; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Effect of margin design and processing steps on marginal adaptation of captek restorations.

Authors:  Amy Shih; Robert Flinton; Jayalakshmi Vaidyanathan; Tritala Vaidyanathan
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-06-08

6.  An evaluation of wear of human enamel opposed by ceramics of different surface finishes.

Authors:  Gauri Mulay; Ramandeep Dugal; Murtuza Buhranpurwala
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.

Authors:  Christa D Hopp; Martin F Land
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-04-18

8.  Investigation on the Tribological Behavior and Wear Mechanism of Five Different Veneering Porcelains.

Authors:  Jie Min; Qianqian Zhang; Xiaoli Qiu; Minhao Zhu; Haiyang Yu; Shanshan Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rim Hmaidouch; Paul Weigl
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns.

Authors:  Jae-Won Choi; Ik-Hyun Bae; Tae-Hwan Noh; Sung-Won Ju; Tae-Kyoung Lee; Jin-Soo Ahn; Tae-Sung Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.