BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the original ParticipACTION campaign effects focused on individual awareness, recall, and understanding. Less studied has been the impact such campaigns have had on the broader organizational capacity to mobilize and advocate for physical activity. With the relaunch of ParticipACTION, the purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore baseline organizational capacity to promote physical activity messages, programs, and services within the Canadian context. METHODS: Using a purposeful sampling strategy, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 49 key informants representing a range of national, provincial, and local organizations with a mandate to promote physical activity. Interview data were analysed using a thematic analytic approach. RESULTS: Key informants painted a generally positive picture of current organizational capacity to promote physical activity messages, programs, and services in Canada. Will and leadership were clear strengths while infrastructure limitations remained the greatest concern. Some specific challenges included: 1) funding issues: the absence of core funding in a climate of shifting funding priorities; 2) the difficulty of working without a national physical activity policy (lack of leadership); 3) inconsistent provincial and educational sector level policies; and 4) a persistent focus on obesity rather than physical inactivity. CONCLUSION: The data generated here can be utilized to monitor the future impact of ParticipACTION on enhancing and utilizing this organizational capacity. A range of indicators are suggested that could be used to illustrate ParticipACTION's impact on the broad field of physical activity promotion in the future.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the original ParticipACTION campaign effects focused on individual awareness, recall, and understanding. Less studied has been the impact such campaigns have had on the broader organizational capacity to mobilize and advocate for physical activity. With the relaunch of ParticipACTION, the purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore baseline organizational capacity to promote physical activity messages, programs, and services within the Canadian context. METHODS: Using a purposeful sampling strategy, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 49 key informants representing a range of national, provincial, and local organizations with a mandate to promote physical activity. Interview data were analysed using a thematic analytic approach. RESULTS: Key informants painted a generally positive picture of current organizational capacity to promote physical activity messages, programs, and services in Canada. Will and leadership were clear strengths while infrastructure limitations remained the greatest concern. Some specific challenges included: 1) funding issues: the absence of core funding in a climate of shifting funding priorities; 2) the difficulty of working without a national physical activity policy (lack of leadership); 3) inconsistent provincial and educational sector level policies; and 4) a persistent focus on obesity rather than physical inactivity. CONCLUSION: The data generated here can be utilized to monitor the future impact of ParticipACTION on enhancing and utilizing this organizational capacity. A range of indicators are suggested that could be used to illustrate ParticipACTION's impact on the broad field of physical activity promotion in the future.
Authors: Christine Joffres; Stephanie Heath; Jane Farquharson; Kari Barkhouse; Robert Hood; Celeste Latter; David R MacLean Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Susan J Elliott; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Kerry Robinson; John Eyles; Roy Cameron; Dexter Harvey; Kim Raine; Dale Gelskey Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2003-06
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ivan Todosijczuk; Guy Faulkner; Michael A Pickering; Susan Cragg; Karen Chad; John C Spence; Mark Tremblay; Cora L Craig; Adrian Bauman; Larry Brawley; Lise Gauvin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Heather L Gainforth; Tanya Berry; Guy Faulkner; Ryan E Rhodes; John C Spence; Mark S Tremblay; Amy E Latimer-Cheung Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Guy Faulkner; Subha Ramanathan; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Tanya Berry; Sameer Deshpande; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Ryan E Rhodes; Mark S Tremblay; John C Spence Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Subha Ramanathan; Guy Faulkner; Tanya Berry; Sameer Deshpande; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Ryan E Rhodes; John C Spence; Mark S Tremblay Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ivan Todosijczuk; Guy Faulkner; Michael A Pickering; Susan Cragg; Karen Chad; John C Spence; Mark Tremblay; Cora L Craig; Adrian Bauman; Larry Brawley; Lise Gauvin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Christina C Loitz; Jodie A Stearns; Shawn N Fraser; Kate Storey; John C Spence Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 3.295