Literature DB >> 19994517

The mixability of angiographic contrast with arterial blood.

Baruch B Lieber1, Chander Sadasivan, Qing Hao, Jaehoon Seong, Liliana Cesar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Angiographic contrast that is routinely injected into arteries is used not only to evaluate arterial geometry but also in many cases to assess perfusion. The authors conducted two experiments to examine the dispersion of angiographic contrast injected antegradely into an artery under conditions similar to those found in selective (carotid artery) or superselective (circle of Willis) angiography in order to determine the distance from the catheter tip at which the contrast can be considered fully mixed with the blood. A third experiment investigated whether the contrast once mixed with blood will separate from the mixture under the gravitational field due to a density mismatch.
METHODS: Experiment I--Under high-speed angiographic acquisition, a bolus of contrast was injected through a catheter along the flow direction of a blood analog fluid flowing through a straight, long, cylindrical tube. The variation in grayscale intensity along the length of the tube was acquired and modeled as the step response to a second-order system. The distance from the catheter tip at which the contrast mixes with the working fluid, the mixing length, was determined as the length along the tube after which the step response settles to within 3% of the steady state value. Experiment II--A bolus of angiographic contrast was injected at rates varying from 0.1 to 1 cc/s through three different catheter sizes in the left common carotid artery of three rabbits. The average cross-sectional grayscale intensity over one cardiac cycle was calculated at four locations along the artery: Immediately distal to the catheter tip, at location of maximum grayscale intensity, and at 10 and 20 arterial diameters from the catheter tip. The status of mixing within 10 arterial diameters was assessed by differences between the grayscale value at this location and that at the maximum and 20 arterial diameter location. Experiment III--Angiographic contrast was premixed by agitation in three separate vials containing normal saline, canine blood, and glycerol/distilled-water mixture. The vials were then stationed vertically and angiographic images obtained every 5 min for 1 h. The average intensity of contrast along the vertical length of each vial was obtained for every time point to record any changes in the distribution of contrast over time.
RESULTS: The first experiment shows that angiographic contrast completely mixes with steady flowing blood analog fluid within about eight tube diameters of the injection site. The second experiment shows that contrast completely mixes with blood within ten arterial diameters under appropriate injection parameters. The third experiment shows that angiographic contrast does not separate from, or settle out of, contrast-carrying fluid mixtures for a period of 1 h.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that under typical injection conditions in the clinical setting, contrast issuing from the catheter completely mixes with the blood within ten artery diameters downstream of the catheter tip. Once mixed, it does not separate from the blood due to gravity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19994517      PMCID: PMC2773458          DOI: 10.1118/1.3243079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Influence of gravity on radiographic contrast material-based measurements of regional blood flow distribution.

Authors:  Anne V Clough; Steven T Haworth; David L Roerig; Eric A Hoffman; Christopher A Dawson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Angiographic analysis of blood flow modification in cerebral aneurysm models with a new asymmetric stent.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Ciprian Ionita; Stephen Rudin; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Adam B Paxton; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2004-04

3.  A quantitative method for determining angiographic jet energy forces and their dissipation: theoretic and practical implications.

Authors:  J A Abbott; M J Lipton; T Hayashi; F C Lee
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1977

4.  An in vitro study of the hemodynamic effects of catheter injections.

Authors:  T W Morris; C S Walike
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Measurement of blood flow by angiography with increasing rate of injection: experimental study.

Authors:  C Gianturco; T Shimizu; F R Stefferda; R P Taylor
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Fluid dynamics in cerebral angiography.

Authors:  R F Mabon; P D Soder; W A Carpenter; D P Giddens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A proposed mechanism for transient increases in arterial pressure and flow during angiographic injections.

Authors:  G L Wolf; D D Shaw; H A Baltaxe; K Kilzer; L Kraft
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Augmented arterial flow and pressure resulting from selective injections through catheters: clinical implications.

Authors:  D C Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Measurement of flow modification in phantom aneurysm model: comparison of coils and a longitudinally and axially asymmetric stent--initial findings.

Authors:  Stephen Rudin; Zhou Wang; Iacovos Kyprianou; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Ye Wu; Hui Meng; Lee R Guterman; Balazs Nemes; Daniel R Bednarek; Jacek Dmochowski; L Nelson Hopkins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Algorithm for identifying and separating beats from arterial pulse records.

Authors:  Ernesto F Treo; Myriam C Herrera; Max E Valentinuzzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cerebral CT perfusion using an interventional C-arm imaging system: cerebral blood flow measurements.

Authors:  A Ganguly; A Fieselmann; M Marks; J Rosenberg; J Boese; Y Deuerling-Zheng; M Straka; G Zaharchuk; R Bammer; R Fahrig
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Angiographic assessment of the efficacy of flow diverter treatment for cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; Ronak Dholakia; Lissa Peeling; Philipp Gölitz; Arnd Doerfler; Baruch B Lieber; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Optimizing the Quality of 4D-DSA Temporal Information.

Authors:  K L Ruedinger; E C Harvey; S Schafer; M A Speidel; C M Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents.

Authors:  Ronak J Dholakia; Ari D Kappel; Andrew Pagano; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber; David J Fiorella; Chander Sadasivan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Evaluation of methods to derive blood flow velocity from 1000 fps high-speed angiographic sequences (HSA) using optical flow (OF) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

Authors:  A Shields; S V Setlur Nagesh; C Ionita; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Derivation of vascular wall shear stress from 1000 fps high-speed angiography (HSA) velocity distributions.

Authors:  A Shields; S V Setlur Nagesh; V Chivukula; C Ionita; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  In vitro investigation of contrast flow jet timing in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Liang-der Jou; Virendra R Desai; Garvin W Britz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Dispersive Transport of Angiographic Contrast During Antegrade Arterial Injection.

Authors:  Qing Hao; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 9.  4D-DSA: Development and Current Neurovascular Applications.

Authors:  K L Ruedinger; S Schafer; M A Speidel; C M Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  A workflow for patient-individualized virtual angiogram generation based on CFD simulation.

Authors:  Jürgen Endres; Markus Kowarschik; Thomas Redel; Puneet Sharma; Viorel Mihalef; Joachim Hornegger; Arnd Dörfler
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.