Literature DB >> 1998647

Enhanced susceptibility to in vitro oxidation of the dense low density lipoprotein subfraction in healthy subjects.

J de Graaf1, H L Hak-Lemmers, M P Hectors, P N Demacker, J C Hendriks, A F Stalenhoef.   

Abstract

Oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein (LDL) has been implicated as a factor in the generation of macrophage-derived foam cells, the hallmark of atherosclerotic plaques. Because LDL consists of discrete subfractions with different physicochemical characteristics, the question arises as to whether these LDL subfractions differ in their susceptibility to oxidative modification. To answer this question, three LDL subfractions, LDL1, LDL2, and LDL3, were isolated from the plasmas of 11 healthy volunteers by density gradient ultracentrifugation. The LDL subfractions were oxidatively modified by incubation with copper ions. Differences in the subfractions' susceptibilities to lipid peroxidation were studied by measuring the formation of the 234-nm-absorbing oxidation products every 3 minutes on an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. A significant inverse linear relation was found between LDL subfractions and lag time (regression coefficient = -8.50, p less than 0.001), indicating that both the dense LDL3 and the light LDL2 were less well protected against oxidative modification than the very light LDL1. The LDL subfractions showed a positive linear relation with the rate of oxidation (regression coefficient = 0.46, p less than 0.001) and the amount of conjugated dienes formed in the LDL subfractions after 4 hours of oxidation (regression coefficient = 9.24, p less than 0.001). Thus, both LDL3 and LDL2 were more extensively modified in time than LDL1, which may be explained by the significantly higher concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids in LDL3 (micromoles per gram LDL cholesterol) compared with LDL1 (Tukey's test, p less than 0.05). These results indicate that the more dense LDL subfractions, that is, LDL2 and LDL3, are more susceptible to oxidative modification and therefore may contribute more to foam cell formation than the less dense LDL subfraction LDL1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1998647     DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.11.2.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb        ISSN: 1049-8834


  71 in total

Review 1.  LDL particle size: an important drug target?

Authors:  I Rajman; P I Eacho; P J Chowienczyk; J M Ritter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Apolipoprotein B versus lipoprotein lipids: vital lessons from the AFCAPS/TexCAPS trial.

Authors:  A D Sniderman; J Bergeron; J Frohlich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Apolipoprotein B is conformationally flexible but anchored at a triolein/water interface: a possible model for lipoprotein surfaces.

Authors:  Libo Wang; Mary T Walsh; Donald M Small
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Both inherited susceptibility and environmental exposure determine the low-density lipoprotein-subfraction pattern distribution in healthy Dutch families.

Authors:  J de Graaf; D W Swinkels; A F de Haan; P N Demacker; A F Stalenhoef
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Approaching the asymptote: obstacles and opportunities for nanomedicine in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sascha N Goonewardena
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Mechanisms, significance and treatment of vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on lipid-regulating therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Woodman; Gerard T Chew; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as a marker for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Core lipid structure is a major determinant of the oxidative resistance of low density lipoprotein.

Authors:  B Schuster; R Prassl; F Nigon; M J Chapman; P Laggner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phospholipase D-modified low density lipoprotein is taken up by macrophages at increased rate. A possible role for phosphatidic acid.

Authors:  M Aviram; I Maor
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Oxidative susceptibility of low density lipoprotein subfractions is related to their ubiquinol-10 and alpha-tocopherol content.

Authors:  D L Tribble; J J van den Berg; P A Motchnik; B N Ames; D M Lewis; A Chait; R M Krauss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.