Literature DB >> 1998468

Why surgeons prefer not to care for trauma patients.

T J Esposito1, R V Maier, F P Rivara, C J Carrico.   

Abstract

A survey of the Washington State Chapter of the American College of Surgeons was undertaken to document the opinions of surgeons on trauma care issues. Thirty-nine percent of the total sample of surgeons who responded would prefer not to treat any trauma patients. These surgeons were more likely to be older, to practice in an urban setting, to feel that trauma call has a negative impact on elective practice, and to believe more strongly that reimbursement from trauma patients is not equal to that of nontrauma patients. They also agreed more strongly with the statements that these patients require a greater time commitment and pose an increased medicolegal risk. The most significant influence on preference not to treat trauma patients was exerted by the perception of a negative impact on practice, older age, and perception of increased medicolegal risk. Reimbursement issues and location of practice were less influential factors. This information can be used to target concerns and barriers to active, willing participation in a trauma care system and to tailor strategies to deal with them effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1998468     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410270032005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  9 in total

1.  Neurosurgical coverage: essential, desired, or irrelevant for good patient care and trauma center status.

Authors:  Thomas J Esposito; R Lawrence Reed; Richard L Gamelli; Fred A Luchette
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  [Development of accident surgery at German universities].

Authors:  A Pannike
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1995-12

3.  [The physician continuing education regulation as a means for quality assurance].

Authors:  A Pannike
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1993-12

4.  Profitable versus unprofitable expansion of trauma and critical care surgery.

Authors:  Jorge L Rodriguez; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Trauma surgery malpractice risk: perception versus reality.

Authors:  Ronald M Stewart; Joe Johnston; Kathy Geoghegan; Tiffany Anthony; John G Myers; Daniel L Dent; Michael G Corneille; Daren S Danielson; H David Root; Basil A Pruitt; Stephen M Cohn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Has the trauma surgeon become house staff for the surgical subspecialist?

Authors:  David J Ciesla; Ernest E Moore; C Clay Cothren; Jeffery L Johnson; Jon M Burch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Acute care surgery: a new training and practice model in the United States.

Authors:  David B Hoyt; Hubert D Kim; Cristobal Barrios
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  An international survey to identify the intrinsic and extrinsic factors of research studies most likely to change orthopaedic practice.

Authors:  P Thornley; D de Sa; N Evaniew; F Farrokhyar; M Bhandari; M Ghert
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 9.  The medical world is flat too.

Authors:  Donald D Trunkey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.