Literature DB >> 1998274

Expanded clinical evaluation of lovastatin (EXCEL) study results. II. Assessment of the human lens after 48 weeks of treatment with lovastatin.

A M Laties1, C L Shear, E A Lippa, A L Gould, H R Taylor, D P Hurley, W P Stephenson, E U Keates, M A Tupy-Visich, A N Chremos.   

Abstract

The crystalline lenses of hypercholesterolemic patients were assessed before and after 48 weeks of treatment with lovastatin or placebo to determine the effect of lovastatin on the human lens. Patients were given a biomicroscopic (slit-lamp) examination of the lens, and a previously validated, standardized classification system was used to describe the findings. A total of 8,245 patients were randomly assigned in equal numbers to treatment with placebo or lovastatin 20 or 40 mg once or twice daily in this double-blind, parallel-group study. Statistical analyses of the distribution of cortical, nuclear and subcapsular opacities at 48 weeks, adjusted for age and presence of an opacity at baseline, showed no significant differences (p less than 0.01) between the placebo and lovastatin-treated groups. Visual acuity assessments at week 48 were also not found to have significantly different distributions among treatment groups. Moreover, no significant differences were found among the groups in the frequencies of greater than or equal to 2-line worsening in visual acuity with concurrent progression in lenticular opacity, cataract extraction, or any spontaneously reported adverse ophthalmologic experience. No evidence was found for an effect of lovastatin on the human lens after 48 weeks of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1998274     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90002-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  How well tolerated are lipid-lowering drugs?

Authors:  B Tomlinson; P Chan; W Lan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  G L Plosker; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Comparative tolerability of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Authors:  J A Farmer; G Torre-Amione
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Statin use and cataract surgery: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in elderly ethnic Chinese patients.

Authors:  Chao-Lun Lai; Wen-Yi Shau; Chia-Hsuin Chang; Ming-Fong Chen; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Management of older adults with hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  J T Pacala; P E McBride; S L Gray
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Regression or reduction in progression of atherosclerosis, and avoidance of coronary events, with lovastatin in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a review.

Authors:  Anna Frisinghelli; Antonio Mafrici
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Absence of effect of simvastatin on the progression of lens opacities in a randomised placebo controlled study. Oxford Cholesterol Study Group.

Authors:  M L Harris; A J Bron; N A Brown; A C Keech; K R Wallendszus; J M Armitage; S MacMahon; G Snibson; R Collins
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Statin Use and the Risk of Cataracts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shandong Yu; Yanpeng Chu; Gang Li; Lu Ren; Qing Zhang; Lin Wu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Statins: past and present.

Authors:  Rachel Hajar
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2011-07

Review 10.  Non-cardiovascular effects associated with statins.

Authors:  Chintan S Desai; Seth S Martin; Roger S Blumenthal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.