Literature DB >> 1997806

The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers.

D M Landers1, S J Petruzzello, W Salazar, D J Crews, K A Kubitz, T L Gannon, M Han.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to determine whether EEG biofeedback training could improve archery performance as well as self-reported measures of concentration and self-confidence. Experienced pre-elite male (N = 16) and female (N = 8) archers were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: (a) correct feedback (i.e., greater left hemisphere low frequency activity), (b) incorrect feedback (i.e., greater right hemisphere low frequency activity), and (c) no feedback control. The pretest and posttest consisted of 27 shots, with EEG data collected for the left and right temporal hemispheres (T3, T4). Feedback subjects were then given EEG biofeedback, while control subjects rested for 30 min. Analyses indicated that only the performance measure was significant. The correct feedback group significantly improved performance, while the incorrect feedback group showed a significant performance decrement from pre- to posttest (Ps less than 0.05). The control group showed no significant pre-post differences in performance. EEG analyses showed differences that were consistent with the training given to the incorrect, but not the correct, feedback group. Overall, the results provide some support for the use of known relationships between EEG and performance as an effective means of providing biofeedback to affect the performance of pre-elite archers.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1997806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions on Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; David Fletcher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Neurofeedback and neural self-regulation: a new perspective based on allostasis.

Authors:  Arash Mirifar; Andreas Keil; Felix Ehrlenspiel
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.703

3.  Train the Brain: Novel Electroencephalography Data Indicate Links between Motor Learning and Brain Adaptations.

Authors:  Adam W Kiefer; J Gualberto Cremades; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Nov Physiother       Date:  2014-04

4.  Neurofeedback in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - different models, different ways of application.

Authors:  Holger Gevensleben; Gunther H Moll; Aribert Rothenberger; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Neurodiagnostics in Sports: Investigating the Athlete's Brain to Augment Performance and Sport-Specific Skills.

Authors:  Oliver Seidel-Marzi; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Neural substrates of cognitive control under the belief of getting neurofeedback training.

Authors:  Manuel Ninaus; Silvia E Kober; Matthias Witte; Karl Koschutnig; Matthias Stangl; Christa Neuper; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  The Do's and Don'ts of Neurofeedback Training: A Review of the Controlled Studies Using Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Jacek Rogala; Katarzyna Jurewicz; Katarzyna Paluch; Ewa Kublik; Ryszard Cetnarski; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Maximizing Performance: Augmented Feedback, Focus of Attention, and/or Reward?

Authors:  Michael Wälchli; Jan Ruffieux; Yann Bourquin; Martin Keller; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  A machine learning approach of predicting high potential archers by means of physical fitness indicators.

Authors:  Rabiu Muazu Musa; Anwar P P Abdul Majeed; Zahari Taha; Siow Wee Chang; Ahmad Fakhri Ab Nasir; Mohamad Razali Abdullah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy, Trainability, and Neuroplasticity of SMR vs. Alpha Rhythm Shooting Performance Neurofeedback Training.

Authors:  Anmin Gong; Wenya Nan; Erwei Yin; Changhao Jiang; Yunfa Fu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.