Literature DB >> 1997486

Factors affecting accuracy and precision in PET volume imaging.

J S Karp1, M E Daube-Witherspoon, G Muehllehner.   

Abstract

Volume imaging positron emission tomographic (PET) scanners with no septa and a large axial acceptance angle offer several advantages over multiring PET scanners. A volume imaging scanner combines high sensitivity with fine axial sampling and spatial resolution. The fine axial sampling minimizes the partial volume effect, which affects the measured concentration of an object. Even if the size of an object is large compared to the slice spacing in a multiring scanner, significant variation in the concentration is measured as a function of the axial position of the object. With a volume imaging scanner, it is necessary to use a three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm in order to avoid variations in the axial resolution as a function of the distance from the center of the scanner. In addition, good energy resolution is needed in order to use a high energy threshold to reduce the coincident scattered radiation.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1997486     DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the In Vivo Specificity of [18F]UCB-H for the SV2A Protein, Compared with SV2B and SV2C in Rats Using microPET.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Serrano; Guillaume Becker; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Alain Seret; Nathalie Mestdagh; Joël Mercier; Frédéric Mievis; Fabrice Giacomelli; Christian Lemaire; Eric Salmon; André Luxen; Alain Plenevaux
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.