Literature DB >> 1997056

Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine.

M S Brockway1, J Bannister, J H McClure, D McKeown, J A Wildsmith.   

Abstract

Ropivacaine, a new long acting amide type local anaesthetic, was compared with bupivacaine in a randomized double-blind study. One hundred and ten patients undergoing extradural anaesthesia received a test dose of 3 ml of 1% lignocaine with adrenaline which was followed by 15 ml of one of five solutions: 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0% ropivacaine or 0.5 or 0.75% bupivacaine. There was little difference between the groups with respect to speed of onset or sensory block. The duration of analgesia was increased by increasing the concentration of both drugs, but this had minimal effect on onset time or extent of block. When the same concentration of each drug was administered, there were inconsistent differences in duration of sensory block, none of which was statistically significant. Increasing concentration of both drugs resulted in greater degree and longer duration of motor block. Ropivacaine produced a slower onset, shorter duration and less intense motor block than the same concentration of bupivacaine. The cardiovascular changes were similar in all groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1997056     DOI: 10.1093/bja/66.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  22 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia.

Authors:  A J Fox; D J Rowbotham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

2.  A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  B T Finucane; A N Sandler; J McKenna; D Reid; A L Milner; M Friedlander; D Muzyka; S O'Callaghan-Enright; V Chan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Adverse effects and drug interactions associated with local and regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Naguib; M M Magboul; A H Samarkandi; M Attia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; David Saunders; Irina Kurowski; Michael J Paech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Use of nerve block techniques for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Per H Rosenberg
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Pharmacological modulation of brain Nav1.2 and cardiac Nav1.5 subtypes by the local anesthetic ropivacaine.

Authors:  Hui-Wen Cheng; Hong-Tian Yang; Jing-Jing Zhou; Yong-Hua Ji; Hong-Yan Zhu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 7.  Complications of regional anaesthesia Incidence and prevention.

Authors:  K A Faccenda; B T Finucane
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Efficacy of epidural dexamethasone versus fentanyl on postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Hanan F Khafagy; Ahmed I Refaat; Hossam H El-Sabae; Maha A Youssif
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Wolfgang Zink; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  High-Impact Clinical Studies That Fomented New Developments in Anesthesia: History of Achievements, 1966-2015.

Authors:  Igor Kissin
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.