Literature DB >> 19969179

Body weight-supported treadmill training for patients with hip fracture: a feasibility study.

Lora M Giangregorio1, Lehana Thabane, Justin Debeer, Leonardo Farrauto, Neil McCartney, Jonathan D Adachi, Alexandra Papaioannou.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Giangregorio LM, Thabane L, deBeer J, Farrauto L, McCartney N, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A. Body weight-supported treadmill training for patients with hip fracture: a feasibility study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) as a strategy for improving independent ambulation among patients who had sustained a hip fracture.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a stable hip fracture and at least 50% weight-bearing. INTERVENTION: BWSTT in lieu of standard walking exercises throughout stay in rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes included the number of patients agreeing to participate in treadmill walking, the number who returned for follow-up assessments, compliance, and the number of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, the Timed Up & Go test, a 2-minute walk test, and the Falls Self-Efficacy Scale. Univariate regression was used to assess the group effect on score changes from baseline to discharge and from baseline to follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 41 potentially eligible patients, 21 (51%) agreed to participate and 14 returned for follow-up assessments. The recruitment goal of 12 patients agreeing to BWSTT was achieved; however, retention by 3-month follow-up was 67%. The average compliance was 3 sessions a week; however, several patients were below average. No adverse events of BWSTT were reported. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: BWSTT may be a feasible method for retraining gait among patients with hip fracture. However, future studies evaluating its efficacy need rigorous methods for ensuring compliance and retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19969179      PMCID: PMC5102692          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  22 in total

1.  Function and social status 10 years after hip fracture. Prospective follow-up of 103 patients.

Authors:  L Borgquist; L Ceder; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-10

2.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Cynthia Lyles; Nicole Crepaz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada.

Authors:  J D Adachi; G Loannidis; C Berger; L Joseph; A Papaioannou; L Pickard; E A Papadimitropoulos; W Hopman; S Poliquin; J C Prior; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T Anastassiades; J P Brown; T Murray; S A Jackson; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function.

Authors:  J Magaziner; W Hawkes; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; K M Fox; M Dolan; G Felsenthal; J Kenzora
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors:  J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1999-04

6.  Mobility after proximal femoral fracture: the relevance of leg extensor power, postural sway and other factors.

Authors:  S E Lamb; R E Morse; J G Evans
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Predictors of functional outcome following intracapsular hip fracture in elderly women. A one-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  P Haentjens; Ph Autier; M Barette; S Boonen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Evaluation of rehabilitation outcomes in older patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Gareth R Jones; Thomas A Miller; Robert J Petrella
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Long-term survival and fracture risk after hip fracture: a 22-year follow-up in women.

Authors:  My von Friesendorff; Jack Besjakov; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis?

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lehana Thabane; Justin DeBeer; Ann Cranney; Lisa Dolovich; Anthony Adili; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improvement of gait ability with a short-term intensive gait rehabilitation program using body weight support treadmill training in community dwelling chronic poststroke survivors.

Authors:  Toshifumi Takao; Naoki Tanaka; Noboru Iizuka; Hideyuki Saitou; Akira Tamaoka; Hisako Yanagi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.