Literature DB >> 19969020

In vitro developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing: relevant models and endpoints.

Anna K Bal-Price1, Helena T Hogberg, Leonora Buzanska, Petros Lenas, Erwin van Vliet, Thomas Hartung.   

Abstract

Environmental chemicals have a potential impact on children's health as the developing brain is much more vulnerable to injury caused by different classes of chemicals than the adult brain. This vulnerability is partly due to the fact that very complex processes of cell development and maturation take place within a tightly controlled time frame. So different stages of brain development are susceptible to toxic effects at different time points. Additionally the adult brain is well protected against chemicals by the blood brain barrier (BBB) whereas the placenta only partially protects against harmful chemical exposure. Many metals easily cross the placenta and BBB barrier since even after the birth BBB is not entirely differentiated (until about 6 months after birth). Additionally, the susceptibility of infants and children is due to increased exposure, augmented absorption rates, and less efficient ability of defense mechanism in comparison to adults. The In Vitro Session during the 12th International Neurotoxicology Association meeting (Jerusalem, June, 2009) provided the opportunity to discuss the new challenges that have to be faced to create new type of safety assessments for regulatory requirements. The integration of various tests into testing strategies as well as combination of information-rich approaches with bioinformatics was discussed. Furthermore relevant models and endpoints for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) evaluation using in vitro approach were presented. The primary neuronal cultures of cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) as well as 3D aggregate model and the possible application of human embryonic and adult stem cells was discussed pointing out the potential of these models to be used for DNT testing. The presented systems are relevant for DNT evaluation as the key processes of brain development such cell proliferation, migration and neuronal/glial differentiation are present. Furthermore, emerging technologies such as gene expression, electrical activity measurements and metabonomics have been identified as promising tools. In a combination with other assays the in vitro approach could be included into a DNT intelligent testing strategy to speed up the process of DNT evaluation mainly by initial prioritization of chemicals with DNT potential for further testing.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19969020     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  34 in total

1.  Coordinated waves of gene expression during neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem cells as basis for novel approaches to developmental neurotoxicity testing.

Authors:  B Zimmer; P B Kuegler; B Baudis; A Genewsky; V Tanavde; W Koh; B Tan; T Waldmann; S Kadereit; M Leist
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Developmental neurotoxicity - challenges in the 21st century and in vitro opportunities.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Helena T Hogberg; Marcel Leist; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 3.  Translating neurobehavioural endpoints of developmental neurotoxicity tests into in vitro assays and readouts.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Remco H S Westerink; Christian Beste; Ambuja S Bale; Pamela J Lein; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges for using the zebrafish to study neuronal connectivity as an endpoint of developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Galen W Miller; Vidya Chandrasekaran; Bianca Yaghoobi; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Biophysical and biomechanical properties of neural progenitor cells as indicators of developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Gautam Mahajan; Moo-Yeal Lee; Chandrasekhar Kothapalli
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  An Overview on Human Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell-Based Alternative In Vitro Models for Developmental Neurotoxicity Assessment.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar Singh; Mahendra Pratap Kashyap
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 7.  A critical review of neonicotinoid insecticides for developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Larry P Sheets; Abby A Li; Daniel J Minnema; Richard H Collier; Moire R Creek; Richard C Peffer
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  SPICODYN: A Toolbox for the Analysis of Neuronal Network Dynamics and Connectivity from Multi-Site Spike Signal Recordings.

Authors:  Vito Paolo Pastore; Aleksandar Godjoski; Sergio Martinoia; Paolo Massobrio
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-01

9.  Potential frameworks to support evaluation of mechanistic data for developmental neurotoxicity outcomes: A symposium report.

Authors:  Laura M Carlson; Frances A Champagne; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Laura Dishaw; Elaine Faustman; William Mundy; Deborah Segal; Christina Sobin; Carol Starkey; Michele Taylor; Susan L Makris; Andrew Kraft
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  Human cell-based micro electrode array platform for studying neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Laura Ylä-Outinen; Juha Heikkilä; Heli Skottman; Riitta Suuronen; Riikka Aänismaa; Susanna Narkilahti
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.