Literature DB >> 19968969

The role of inferior frontal and parietal areas in differentiating meaningful and meaningless object-directed actions.

Roger Newman-Norlund1, Hein T van Schie, Marline E C van Hoek, Raymond H Cuijpers, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades single cell recordings in primates and neuroimaging experiments in humans have uncovered the key properties of visuo-motor mirror neurons located in monkey premotor cortex and parietal cortices as well as homologous areas in the human inferior frontal and inferior parietal cortices which presumably house neurons with similar response properties. One of the most interesting claims regarding the human mirror neuron system (MNS) is that its activity reflects high-level action understanding. If this was the case, one would expect signal in the MNS to differentiate between meaningful and meaningless actions. In the current experiment we tested this prediction using a novel paradigm. Functional magnetic resonance images were collected while participants viewed (i) short films of object-directed actions (ODAs) which were either semantically meaningful, i.e. a hand pressed a stapler or semantically meaningless, i.e. a foot pressed a stapler, (ii) short films of pantomimed actions and (iii) static pictures of objects. Consistent with the notion that the MNS represents high-level action understanding, meaningful and meaningless actions elicited BOLD signal differences at bilateral sites in the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) of the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) where we observed a double dissociation between BOLD response and meaningfullness of actions. Comparison of superadditive responses in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and IPL (supramarginal) regions revealed differential contributions to action understanding. These data further specify the role of specific components of the MNS in understanding object-directed actions. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968969     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  20 in total

1.  Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.

Authors:  M van Elk; S Viswanathan; H T van Schie; H Bekkering; S T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cortical regions involved in the observation of bimanual actions.

Authors:  Marcus H Heitger; Marc J-M Macé; Jan Jastorff; Stephan P Swinnen; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 4.  Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Beyond human intentions and emotions.

Authors:  Elsa Juan; Chris Frum; Francesco Bianchi-Demicheli; Yi-Wen Wang; James W Lewis; Stephanie Cacioppo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Observational learning of new movement sequences is reflected in fronto-parietal coherence.

Authors:  Jurjen van der Helden; Hein T van Schie; Christiaan Rombouts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural coding of cooperative vs. affective human interactions: 150 ms to code the action's purpose.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Federica Riva; Laura Paganelli; Stefano F Cappa; Nicola Canessa; Daniela Perani; Alberto Zani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modulation of brain activity during action observation: influence of perspective, transitivity and meaningfulness.

Authors:  Sébastien Hétu; Catherine Mercier; Fanny Eugène; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  FMRI supports the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance.

Authors:  Claire Landmann; Sofia M Landi; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context.

Authors:  Lucía Amoruso; Carlos Gelormini; Francisco Aboitiz; Miguel Alvarez González; Facundo Manes; Juan F Cardona; Agustín Ibanez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.