Literature DB >> 1996880

Correlation of phasic muscle strength and corticomotoneuron conduction time in multiple sclerosis.

W van der Kamp1, A Maertens de Noordhout, P D Thompson, J C Rothwell, B L Day, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

Central motor conduction times for the adductor pollicis muscle, the twitch force of that muscle to scalp magnetic motor cortex stimulation, and the maximum force of phasic voluntary contraction of the same muscle were measured in 15 patients with multiple sclerosis. Two tests of manual dexterity of the same hand also were studied: the Purdue pegboard test, and the maximal frequency of a scissors movement of the thumb and index finger. The patients had normal strength or minimal weakness of the intrinsic muscles of the hand on clinical examination. The mean central motor conduction times for the adductor pollicis muscle for the patients were longer than normal, the peak twitch force of the adductor pollicis muscle evoked by cortical stimulation and the maximum force of a phasic voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle were smaller than normal. There were strong correlations between all these measures. Central motor conduction time in the patients was inversely correlated with voluntary phasic force and the twitch force after cortical stimulation. That is, the longer the central motor conduction time, the weaker the force. Prolonged central motor conduction time is likely to be accompanied by conduction block in corticomotoneuron pathways. The correlation of central motor conduction time with voluntary phasic force and the twitch force most likely reflects the degree of conduction block and temporal dispersion rather than delay in conduction per se. These results indicate that objective assessments of phasic muscle strength may reveal correlations with central motor conduction time that are not evident on conventional clinical examination which assesses tonic muscle contraction strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1996880     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410290104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological markers.

Authors:  Letizia Leocani; Giancarlo Comi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L Leocani; M Rovaris; F M Boneschi; S Medaglini; P Rossi; V Martinelli; S Amadio; G Comi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Peripheral and central conduction studies in neurolathyrism.

Authors:  U K Misra; V P Sharma
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Possible mechanisms of the formation of chronic fatigue syndrome in the clinical picture of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D S Kasatkin; N N Spirin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-03

Review 5.  Exercise and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lesley J White; Rudolph H Dressendorfer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Corticomotor organisation and motor function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Michelle L Byrnes; Sarah A Archer; Allan G Kermode; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children.

Authors:  Marjorie A Garvey; Volker Mall
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Dissecting the mechanisms underlying short-interval intracortical inhibition using exercise.

Authors:  Steve Vucic; Benjamin C Cheah; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.