Literature DB >> 19968158

Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson's (closed) vs Milligan Morgan's technique (open).

N Pokharel1, R K Chhetri, B Malla, H N Joshi, R K M Shrestha.   

Abstract

This study was done to compare the efficacy of closed Vs open haemorrhoidectomy. The study design was unblinded randomised control trial at Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital. Total number of patients was 56 all with 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Post operative pain was taken as main outcome measures. Operation time varied from 200 seconds for each haemorroidal cushion with open technique to 626 seconds by closed technique. The blood loss was not quantifiable in closed technique. Pain was scored on visual analogue scale. In closed group, the pain score was 4.9 immediate post operative period and 2.3 (24 hours later). In the other group, the scores were 7.8 and 6.9. These differences were significant. At the end of study we came to a conclusion that haemorrhoidectomy using closed technique has more advantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nepal Med Coll J


  3 in total

Review 1.  Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Muhammad I Bhatti; Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical management of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  S P Agbo
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2011-07

Review 3.  Strategies to Reduce Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Romyen Jitmungngan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.