Literature DB >> 19967866

Genetic differences among populations of a marine snail drive geographic variation in predation.

Eric Sanford1, David J Worth.   

Abstract

The extent to which community processes can be generalized from local field studies to larger spatial scales remains a contentious issue. The search for broad generality can be hampered when species interactions vary geographically, a common phenomenon attributed to a wide range of underlying ecological factors. Less attention has been directed toward understanding the additional role that evolutionary processes may play in modifying the way that pairs of species interact over large spatial scales. Here we examine whether marked geographic variation in the interaction between a predatory snail (Nucella canaliculata) and an intertidal mussel (Mytilus californianus) arises from phenotypic plasticity or fixed genetic differences among snail populations. Over a three-year period, we reared snails from eight populations in California and Oregon, USA, through two laboratory generations and tested whether family lines differed in their ability to drill M. californianus. Remarkably, F2 generation snails from Oregon sources were generally unable to drill mid-sized Mytilus californianus (5-7 cm long), whereas snails from California readily drilled this prey. Because snails were raised through two generations on a common diet (Mytilus trossulus), these differences among populations likely have a genetic basis. Snails from California and Oregon readily interbred and produced viable offspring in the laboratory, suggesting that populations belong to a single biological species. Field surveys of mussel beds revealed striking geographic variation in predation that closely matched the observed differences in the drilling capacity of N. canaliculata. Drilled M. californianus were common at all sites in California and included many large mussels (> 10 cm long). In contrast, drilled M. californianus were rare on the central Oregon coast and consisted mostly of small mussels (< 3 cm). We hypothesize that persistent variation in prey recruitment along the coast has selected for interpopulation differences in the drilling capacity of this direct-developing snail, with potential consequences for the size structure of mussel beds. Combined with growing evidence of restricted gene flow and low connectivity among many marine populations, this study highlights the importance of considering the contribution of evolutionary processes to geographic variation in species interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19967866     DOI: 10.1890/08-2055.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Population variation affects interactions between two California salt marsh plant species more than precipitation.

Authors:  Akana E Noto; Jonathan B Shurin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Climate shapes population variation in dogwhelk predation on foundational mussels.

Authors:  Gina M Contolini; Kerry Reid; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Historical baselines and the future of shell calcification for a foundation species in a changing ocean.

Authors:  Catherine A Pfister; Kaustuv Roy; J Timothy Wootton; Sophie J McCoy; Robert T Paine; Thomas H Suchanek; Eric Sanford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Geographic variation in feeding preference of a generalist herbivore: the importance of seaweed chemical defenses.

Authors:  Amanda T McCarty; Erik E Sotka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Extensive geographic and ontogenetic variation characterizes the trophic ecology of a temperate reef fish on southern California (USA) rocky reefs.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Coulson A Lantz; Tiana L Egloff; Emi Kondo; Seth D Newsome; Kerri Loke-Smith; Daniel J Pondella; Kelly A Young; Christopher G Lowe
Journal:  Mar Ecol Prog Ser       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.824

6.  Predator cue and prey density interactively influence indirect effects on basal resources in intertidal oyster reefs.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Kelly Rooker; Meagan Murdock; David L Kimbro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sea Star Wasting Disease in the Keystone Predator Pisaster ochraceus in Oregon: Insights into Differential Population Impacts, Recovery, Predation Rate, and Temperature Effects from Long-Term Research.

Authors:  Bruce A Menge; Elizabeth B Cerny-Chipman; Angela Johnson; Jenna Sullivan; Sarah Gravem; Francis Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.