Literature DB >> 19967514

The delayed type hypersensitivity assay using protein and xenogeneic cell antigens.

Rodney R Dietert, Terry L Bunn, Ji-Eun Lee.   

Abstract

The delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) assay has a lengthy history in immunotoxicity testing since it was one of the original functional assays included in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) immunotoxicology test panel. Based on NTP data analysis, the DTH assay is among the most predictive immunotoxicity tests when included with at least two other immune parameters. The DTH assay has the advantage of being: (1) a useful measure of cell-mediated immunity, (2) an in vivo assay where there is less opportunity for ex vivo confounders and (3) a clinically significant human correlate to the tuberculin test. Disadvantages of the DTH assay are that it is potentially labor-intensive to perform, it is somewhat resistant to automation and, when compared with the cyctotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assay, it is a relatively crude measurement. However, some groups have been attempting to address the limitations of the DTH assays (see Note 1).The assay is related to the contact hypersensitivity response (CHR), which is covered in another chapter. The DTH response has been used as an indicator of cell-mediated immune status and is dependent upon both T helper 1(Th1)-driven responses as well as cell recruitment and chemotaxis to a local site. As a result, the DTH functional response may be influenced by disruption of either Th1-driven, antigen-dependent T cell development or mobilization of sensitized T cells to a local site. The present chapter describes four common protocols with consideration restricted to protein and xenogeneic cell immunogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19967514     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of neurobehavioral abnormalities and immunotoxicity in response to oral imidacloprid exposure in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Dana Franzen-Klein; Mark Jankowski; Charlotte L Roy; Hoa Nguyen-Phuc; Da Chen; Lorin Neuman-Lee; Patrick Redig; Julia Ponder
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-02-05

2.  Type 1 and type 2 immune response profiles of commercial dairy cows in 4 regions across Canada.

Authors:  Kathleen A Thompson-Crispi; Bonnie A Mallard
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  The determination of in vivo envelope-specific cell-mediated immune responses in equine infectious anemia virus-infected ponies.

Authors:  Chong Liu; Frank R Cook; Sheila J Cook; Jodi K Craigo; Deborah L Even; Charles J Issel; Ronald C Montelaro; David W Horohov
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Arsenic exposure and cell-mediated immunity in pre-school children in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Sultan Ahmed; Sophie E Moore; Maria Kippler; Renee Gardner; M D H Hawlader; Yukiko Wagatsuma; Rubhana Raqib; Marie Vahter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Development of a Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity (DTH) Model in the Cynomolgus Monkey.

Authors:  Caroline Bouchez; Fréderic Gervais; Renaud Fleurance; Bernard Palate; Jean-Jacques Legrand; Jacques Descotes
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Astaxanthin Mitigates Thiacloprid-Induced Liver Injury and Immunotoxicity in Male Rats.

Authors:  Shimaa M Abou-Zeid; Samira H Aljuaydi; Huda O AbuBakr; Enas A Tahoun; Alessandro Di Cerbo; Mahmoud Alagawany; Samah R Khalil; Mayada R Farag
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.