Literature DB >> 19967337

Association of medication attitudes with non-persistence and non-compliance with medication to prevent fractures.

J T Schousboe1, B E Dowd, M L Davison, R L Kane.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Our objective was to assess the association of self-reported non-persistence (stopping fracture-prevention medication for more than 1 month) and self-reported non-compliance (missing doses of prescribed medication) with perceived need for fracture-prevention medication, concerns regarding long-term harm from and/or dependence upon medications, and medication-use self-efficacy (confidence in one's ability to successfully take medication in the context of their daily life).
INTRODUCTION: Non-persistence (stopping medication prematurely) and non-compliance (not taking medications at the prescribed times) with oral medications to prevent osteoporotic fractures is widespread and attenuates their fracture reduction benefit.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey and medical record review of 729 patients at a large multispecialty clinic in the United States prescribed an oral bisphosphonate between January 1, 2006 and March 31, 2007.
RESULTS: Low perceived necessity for fracture-prevention medication was strongly associated with non-persistence independent of other predictors, but not with non-compliance. Concerns about medications were associated with non-persistence, but not with non-compliance. Low medication-use self-efficacy was associated with non-persistence and non-compliance.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-persistence and non-compliance with oral bisphosphonate medication have different, albeit overlapping, sets of predictors. Low perceived necessity of fracture-prevention medication, high concerns about long-term safety of and dependence upon medication , and low medication-use self-efficacy all predict non-persistence with oral bisphosphonates, whereas low medication-use self-efficacy strongly predicts non-compliance with oral bisphosphonate medication. Assessment of and influence of these medication attitudes among patients at high risk of fracture are likely necessary to achieve better persistence and compliance with fracture-prevention therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19967337     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1141-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  Determinants of compliance with medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of self-efficacy expectations.

Authors:  H Brus; M van de Laar; E Taal; J Rasker; O Wiegman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-01

2.  The role of self-efficacy in HIV treatment adherence: validation of the HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale (HIV-ASES).

Authors:  Mallory O Johnson; Torsten B Neilands; Samantha E Dilworth; Stephen F Morin; Robert H Remien; Margaret A Chesney
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-06-23

3.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

4.  Osteoporosis beliefs and antiresorptive medication use.

Authors:  Richard R Cline; Joel F Farley; Richard A Hansen; Jon C Schommer
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group.

Authors:  S T Harris; N B Watts; H K Genant; C D McKeever; T Hangartner; M Keller; C H Chesnut; J Brown; E F Eriksen; M S Hoseyni; D W Axelrod; P D Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The impact of osteoporosis medication beliefs and side-effect experiences on non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; John T Schousboe; Richard R Cline; Thomas W Weiss
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between depressive symptoms and medication adherence among hypertensive African Americans.

Authors:  Antoinette Schoenthaler; Gbenga Ogedegbe; John P Allegrante
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2007-12-12

8.  Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance?

Authors:  R B Haynes; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; E S Gibson; C D Bernholz; J Mukherjee
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Assessment of sulfonylurea adherence and metabolic control.

Authors:  B J Mason; J R Matsuyama; S G Jue
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis.

Authors:  Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Andrea M Burden
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Differing perceptions of intervention thresholds for fracture risk: a survey of patients and doctors.

Authors:  F Douglas; K J Petrie; T Cundy; A Horne; G Gamble; A Grey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The economics of improving medication adherence in osteoporosis: validation and application of a simulation model.

Authors:  Amanda R Patrick; John T Schousboe; Elena Losina; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  GRAND: the German retrospective cohort analysis on compliance and persistence and the associated risk of fractures in osteoporotic women treated with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  P Hadji; V Claus; V Ziller; M Intorcia; K Kostev; T Steinle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Impact of interactive voice response technology on primary adherence to bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A D Cizmic; R M F Heilmann; J L Milchak; C S Riggs; S J Billups
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Natural history, reasons for, and impact of low/non-adherence to medications for osteoporosis in a cohort of community-dwelling older women already established on medication: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  E M Clark; V C Gould; J H Tobias; R Horne
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; M Hiligsmann; V Rabenda; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Tendency to adhere to provider-recommended treatments and subsequent pain severity among individuals with cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Peter Franks; Daniel J Tancredi; Naomi Saito; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Structural equation modeling of the proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; Ning Jackie Zhang; Timothy Stump; Xiaoquan Zhao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.