| Literature DB >> 19966996 |
S Jayarama1, Shaliny Shenoy, B Unnikrishnan, John Ramapuram, Manjula Rao.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the socio-demographic profile and risk behavior pattern of seropositive attendees in the voluntary counseling and testing center (VCTC)? STUDYEntities:
Keywords: HIV; high-risk sexual behavior; voluntary counseling and testing center
Year: 2008 PMID: 19966996 PMCID: PMC2782228 DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.39243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Community Med ISSN: 0970-0218
Trend of seropositivity amongst attendees of VCTC clinic seropositives
| Year | Male no. (%) | Female no. (%) | Total no. | Male | Female | Total no. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | - | - | 608 | 94 | 63 | 157 (25) |
| 2002 | 1086 (56.95) | 827 (43.05) | 1907 | 221 | 138 | 359 (19) |
| 2003 | 1052 (59.91) | 704 (40.09) | 1756 | 246 | 149 | 395 (22) |
| 2004 | 1367 (59.20) | 942 (40.80) | 2309 | 293 | 183 | 476 (21) |
| 2005 | 1611 (67.21) | 786 (32.79) | 2397 | 364 | 175 | 539 (23) |
| 2006 | 591 (60.24) | 390 (39.76) | 981 | 209 | 121 | 330 (34) |
| 2007 (till April) | 1100 (60.34) | 723 (39.66) | 1823 | 246 | 151 | 397 (22) |
Age and sex profile of seropositive attendees
| Age Year | 2005 ( | 2006 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male no. (%) | Female no. (%) | Male no. (%) | Female no. (%) | |
| 0-5 | 10 (1.20) | 8 (4.57) | 3 (1.44) | 3 (2.48) |
| 6-14 | 04 (1.20) | 4 (2.28) | 5 (2.39) | 6 (5.96) |
| 15-50 | 335 (92.03) | 159 (90.86) | 178 (85.17) | 98 (80.99) |
| 50+ | 13 (3.56) | 4 (2.28) | 18 (08.61) | 3 (2.48) |
| Not specified | 2 (0.55) | 5 (2.39) | 11 (9.09) | |
| Total | 364 (67.53) | 175 (32.47) | 209 (63.33) | 121 (36.66) |
| χ2 = 2.927, | χ2 = 0.429, | |||
Demographic profiles of HIV positives attending VCTC
| Characteristics | 2005 ( | 2006 ( | Chi-square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marital status | 89.9 | |||
| Married | 311 (57.7) | 232 (70.3) | ||
| Unmarried | 206 (38.2) | 60 (18.2) | ||
| Separated/divorce | 22 (4.1) | 38 (11.5) | ||
| Religion | 21.1 | |||
| Hindu | 444 (82.4) | 232 (70.4) | ||
| Muslim | 56 (10.4) | 53 (16.1) | ||
| Christian | 38 (7.1) | 39 (11.8) | ||
| Others | 1 (0.2) | 6 (1.8) | ||
| Education | 15.8 | |||
| Illiterate | 14 (2.6) | 10 (3) | ||
| Primary | 313 (58.1) | 197 (59.7) | ||
| 6-12 standard | 137 (25.4) | 66 (20) | ||
| Graduate | 5 (0.9) | 16 (4.9) | ||
| Others | 70 (13) | 41 (12) | ||
| Residence | 14.6 | |||
| Mangalore tehsil | 258 (45.9) | 132 (40) | ||
| Bantwal (rural) | 39 (7.2) | 24 (7.2) | ||
| Belthangady (rural) | 34 (6.3) | 20 (6.1) | ||
| Puttur (rural) | 20 (3.7) | 11 (3.3) | ||
| Sullia (rural) | 8 (1.5) | 6 (1.8) | ||
| Udupi district | 52 (9.7) | 21 (6.4) | ||
| Kasargod district | 70 (1.3) | 70 (21.2) | ||
| (Kerala) Other districts | 58 (10.8) | 40 (12.1) | ||
| Occupation | 36.8 | |||
| House wife | 93 (17.3) | 89 (27) | ||
| Laborer/hotel worker | 111 (21) | 63 (19.1) | ||
| Driver | 22 (4.1) | 10 (3) | ||
| Students | 7 (1.3) | 9 (2.7) | ||
| Beedi roller | 32 (5.9) | 20 (6.1) | ||
| Agriculture | 15 (2.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| Business | 37 (6.9) | 25 (7.6) | ||
| Semi-skilled | 24 (2.5) | 30 (9.1) | ||
| Others | 198 (36.7) | 84 (25.5) |
Pattern of risk behavior of seropositives attending voluntary counseling and testing center
| 2005 ( | 2006 ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Route of transmission | Male | Female | Total no. (%) | Male | Female | Total no. (%) |
| Sexual | 232 | 156 | 388 (72) | 135 | 120 | 255 (77) |
| Exposed to CSWs | 130 | 5 | 135 (25) | 83 | 1 | 84 (25) |
| Exposure to multiple sexual partners | 202 | 6 | 208 (39) | 122 | 4 | 126 (38) |
| Premarital sex | 109 | 4 | 113 (21) | 75 | 1 | 76 (23) |
| Spouse HIV +ve | 46 | 59 | 105 (19) | 40 | 50 | 90 (27) |
| Parent to child | 14 | 13 | 27 (5) | 11 | 9 | 20 (6) |
| Received blood | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.3) | 4 | 0 | 4 (1.2) |
| Injecting drugs/unknown | 19 | 10 | 29 (5.4) | 26 | 6 | 32 (10) |
Many attendees had more than one high-risk sexual behavior
P < 0.001