Literature DB >> 19966636

Assessment of the efficacy of the rectovaginal button fistula plug for the treatment of ileal pouch-vaginal and rectovaginal fistulas.

Simon Gonsalves1, Peter Sagar, John Lengyel, Charles Morrison, Richard Dunham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of rectovaginal and ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas remains a challenging problem for the colorectal surgeon. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term efficacy of the new Surgisis Biodesign rectovaginal button fistula plug in patients with such fistulas.
METHODS: Between May 2008 and September 2008, patients with confirmed rectovaginal and ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas with backgrounds of inflammatory bowel disease were treated with the button fistula plug. The fistulas were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or examination under anesthesia before the procedure.
RESULTS: Twelve patients with a median age of 36 (range, 29-42) years underwent a total of 20 plug insertions. Five patients had confirmed rectovaginal fistulas and seven patients had ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas. At a median follow-up of 15 (interquartile range, 10-21) weeks, 7 of 12 patients (58%) had been treated successfully. Seven of the 20 plugs that were inserted (35%) were successful. This equates to the successful treatment of three of five (60%) of the rectovaginal fistulas, and four of seven (57%) of the ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas. Of the six patients who initially failed, a repeat procedure was performed of which one was successful. Two patients underwent a third repeat procedure, which was again unsuccessful in both cases. The success rate of these eight repeat plug insertions was therefore 12.5%. All plug failures were the result of dislodgement of the plug. There was no morbidity in our series.
CONCLUSIONS: The new button fistula plug successfully treated 7 of 12 (58%) rectovaginal and ileal pouch-vaginal fistulas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966636     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b55560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Extracellular matrices for gastrointestinal surgery: ex vivo testing and current applications.

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Goran Marjanovic; Peter Helwig; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Rectovaginal fistulas.

Authors:  Teresa H Debeche-Adams; Jaime L Bohl
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Management of anoperineal lesions in Crohn's disease: a French National Society of Coloproctology national consensus.

Authors:  D Bouchard; F Pigot; G Staumont; L Siproudhis; L Abramowitz; P Benfredj; C Brochard; N Fathallah; J-L Faucheron; T Higuero; Y Panis; V de Parades; B Vinson-Bonnet; D Laharie
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Treatment of high ano-vaginal fistula with GORE BIO-A ® Fistula Plug in an immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  G A Binda; A Piscitelli; R Longhin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Rectovaginal Fistulae.

Authors:  Bidhan Das; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

6.  Use of Surgisis mesh in the management of polypropylene mesh erosion into the vagina.

Authors:  Su-Yen Khong; Alan Lam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Surgical treatment of anorectal crohn disease.

Authors:  Robert T Lewis; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  The challenge of pouch-vaginal fistulas: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Maslekar; P M Sagar; D Harji; C Bruce; B Griffiths
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.781

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.