Literature DB >> 19966582

Familiarization, reliability, and evaluation of a multiple sprint running test using self-selected recovery periods.

Mark Glaister1, Chad Witmer, Dustin W Clarke, John J Guers, Justin L Heller, Gavin L Moir.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to investigate the process of self-selected recovery in a multiple sprint test with a view to using self-selected recovery time as a means of reliably quantifying an individual's ability to resist fatigue in this type of exercise. Twenty physically active exercise science students (means ± SD for age, height, body mass, body fat, and VO2max of the subjects were 21 ± 2 yr, 1.79 ± 0.09 m, 83.7 ± 10.8 kg, 16.6 ± 3.9%, and 52.7 ± 7.2 ml·kg·min, respectively) completed 4 trials of a 12 × 30 m multiple sprint running test under the instruction that they should allow sufficient recovery time between sprints to enable maximal sprint performance to be maintained throughout each trial. Mean recovery times across the 4 trials were 73.9 ± 24.7, 82.3 ± 23.8, 77.6 ± 19.1, and 77.5 ± 13.9 seconds, respectively, with variability across the first 3 trials considered evidence of learning effects. Test-retest reliability across trials 3 to 4 revealed a good level of reliability as evidenced by a coefficient of variation of 11.1% (95% likely range: 8.0-18.1%) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76 (95% likely range: 0.40-0.91). Despite no change in sprint performance throughout the trials, ratings of perceived exertion increased progressively and significantly (p < 0.001) from a value of 10 ± 2 after sprint 3 to 14 ± 2 after sprint 12. The correlation between relative VO2max and mean recovery time was 0.14 (95% likely range: -0.37-0.58). The results of the present study show that after the completion of 2 familiarization trials, the ability to maintain sprinting performance in a series of repeated sprints can be self-regulated by an athlete to a high degree of accuracy without the need for external timepieces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19966582     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac33c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Repeated-sprint ability - part I: factors contributing to fatigue.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The influence of aerobic fitness on the recovery of peak power output.

Authors:  M Glaister; John R Pattison; Bernadette Dancy; Gillian McInnes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Aerobic and anaerobic determinants of repeated sprint ability in team sports athletes.

Authors:  Z Gharbi; W Dardouri; R Haj-Sassi; K Chamari; N Souissi
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Anticipatory Anxiety, Familiarization, and Performance: Finding the Sweet Spot to Optimize High-Quality Data Collection and Minimize Subject Burden.

Authors:  Aspen E Streetman; Aidan K Lewis; Elizabeth L Rogers; Katie M Heinrich; Justin A DeBlauw
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Effect of the number of sprint repetitions on the variation of blood lactate concentration in repeated sprint sessions.

Authors:  Z Gharbi; W Dardouri; R Haj-Sassi; C Castagna; K Chamari; N Souissi
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.