Literature DB >> 19966418

Structures of the apo and holo forms of formate dehydrogenase from the bacterium Moraxella sp. C-1: towards understanding the mechanism of the closure of the interdomain cleft.

I G Shabalin1, E V Filippova, K M Polyakov, E G Sadykhov, T N Safonova, T V Tikhonova, V I Tishkov, V O Popov.   

Abstract

NAD(+)-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) catalyzes the oxidation of formate ion to carbon dioxide coupled with the reduction of NAD(+) to NADH. The crystal structures of the apo and holo forms of FDH from the methylotrophic bacterium Moraxella sp. C-1 (MorFDH) are reported at 1.96 and 1.95 A resolution, respectively. MorFDH is similar to the previously studied FDH from the bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 101 in overall structure, cofactor-binding mode and active-site architecture, but differs in that the eight-residue-longer C-terminal fragment is visible in the electron-density maps of MorFDH. MorFDH also differs in the organization of the dimer interface. The holo MorFDH structure supports the earlier hypothesis that the catalytic residue His332 can form a hydrogen bond to both the substrate and the transition state. Apo MorFDH has a closed conformation of the interdomain cleft, which is unique for an apo form of an NAD(+)-dependent dehydrogenase. A comparison of the structures of bacterial FDH in open and closed conformations allows the differentiation of the conformational changes associated with cofactor binding and domain motion and provides insights into the mechanism of the closure of the interdomain cleft in FDH. The C-terminal residues 374-399 and the substrate (formate ion) or inhibitor (azide ion) binding are shown to play an essential role in the transition from the open to the closed conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966418     DOI: 10.1107/S0907444909040773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  7 in total

1.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of formate oxidase, an enzyme of the glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase family.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Maeda; Daiju Doubayashi; Takumi Ootake; Masaya Oki; Bunzo Mikami; Hiroyuki Uchida
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2010-08-26

2.  Role of Protein Motions in Catalysis by Formate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Dimitri Antoniou; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Formate formation and formate conversion in biological fuels production.

Authors:  Bryan R Crable; Caroline M Plugge; Michael J McInerney; Alfons J M Stams
Journal:  Enzyme Res       Date:  2011-05-24

4.  Atomic Resolution Crystal Structure of NAD(+)-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase from Bacterium Moraxella sp. C-1.

Authors:  I G Shabalin; K M Polyakov; V I Tishkov; V O Popov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  The role of ala198 in the stability and coenzyme specificity of bacterial formate dehydrogenases.

Authors:  A A Alekseeva; V V Fedorchuk; S A Zarubina; E G Sadykhov; A D Matorin; S S Savin; V I Tishkov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Classification, substrate specificity and structural features of D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases: 2HADH knowledgebase.

Authors:  Dorota Matelska; Ivan G Shabalin; Jagoda Jabłońska; Marcin J Domagalski; Jan Kutner; Krzysztof Ginalski; Wladek Minor
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Effect of Additional Amino Acid Replacements on the Properties of Multi-point Mutant Bacterial Formate Dehyderogenase PseFDH SM4S.

Authors:  A A Pometun; P D Parshin; N P Galanicheva; L A Shaposhnikov; D L Atroshenko; E V Pometun; V V Burmakin; S Yu Kleymenov; S S Savin; V I Tishkov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.845

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.