Literature DB >> 19966172

Improvement in genetic evaluation of female fertility in dairy cattle using multiple-trait models including milk production traits.

C Sun1, P Madsen, M S Lund, Y Zhang, U S Nielsen, G Su.   

Abstract

This study investigated the improvement in genetic evaluation of fertility traits by using production traits as secondary traits (MILK = 305-d milk yield, FAT = 305-d fat yield, and PROT = 305-d protein yield). Data including 471,742 records from first lactations of Denmark Holstein cows, covering the years of inseminations during first lactations from 1995 to 2004, were analyzed. Six fertility traits (i.e., interval in days from calving to first insemination, calving interval, days open, interval in days from first to last insemination, numbers of inseminations per conception, and nonreturn rate within 56 d after first service) were analyzed using single- and multiple-trait sire models including 1 or 3 production traits. Model stability was evaluated by correlation between EBV from 2 sub-data sets (DATA(A) and DATA(B)). Model predictive ability was assessed by the correlation between EBV from training data (DATA(A) or DATA(B)) and daughter performance (yield deviation, defined as average of daughter-records adjusted for nongenetic effects) from test data (DATA(B) or DATA(A)) in a cross-validation procedure, and correlation between EBV obtained from the whole data set (DATA(T)) and from a reduced data set (DATA(C1), which only contained the first crop daughters) for proven bulls. In addition, the superiority of the models was evaluated by expected reliability of EBV, calculated from the prediction error variance of EBV. Based on these criteria, the models combining milk production traits showed better model stability and predictive ability than single-trait models for all the fertility traits, except for nonreturn rate within 56 d after first service. The stability and predictive ability for the model including MILK or PROT were similar to the model including all 3 milk production traits and better than the model including FAT. In addition, it was found that single-trait models underestimated genetic trend of fertility traits. These results suggested that genetic evaluation of fertility traits would be improved using a multiple-trait model including MILK or PROT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966172     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Environmental factors affecting milk, fat and protein yields in Jersey cattle in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Edward Mtunduwatha Missanjo; Venancio E Imbayarwo-Chikosi; Tinyiko E Halimani
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Genetic variants related to gap junctions and hormone secretion influence conception rates in cows.

Authors:  Mayumi Sugimoto; Shinji Sasaki; Yusaku Gotoh; Yuuki Nakamura; Yoshito Aoyagi; Takayoshi Kawahara; Yoshikazu Sugimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Monitoring Hip and Elbow Dysplasia achieved modest genetic improvement of 74 dog breeds over 40 years in USA.

Authors:  Yali Hou; Yachun Wang; Xuemei Lu; Xu Zhang; Qian Zhao; Rory J Todhunter; Zhiwu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A 660-Kb deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production segregates at high frequency in Nordic Red cattle: additional evidence for the common occurrence of balancing selection in livestock.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar Kadri; Goutam Sahana; Carole Charlier; Terhi Iso-Touru; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Latifa Karim; Ulrik Sander Nielsen; Frank Panitz; Gert Pedersen Aamand; Nina Schulman; Michel Georges; Johanna Vilkki; Mogens Sandø Lund; Tom Druet
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Variance components and correlations of female fertility traits in Chinese Holstein population.

Authors:  Aoxing Liu; Mogens Sandø Lund; Yachun Wang; Gang Guo; Ganghui Dong; Per Madsen; Guosheng Su
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Genotype-by-environment interaction of fertility traits in Danish Holstein cattle using a single-step genomic reaction norm model.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Morten Kargo; Aoxing Liu; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Yuchun Pan; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Genomic Analysis of Spontaneous Abortion in Holstein Heifers and Primiparous Cows.

Authors:  Kayleen F Oliver; Alexandria M Wahl; Mataya Dick; Jewel A Toenges; Jennifer N Kiser; Justine M Galliou; Joao G N Moraes; Gregory W Burns; Joseph Dalton; Thomas E Spencer; Holly L Neibergs
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Of rodents and ruminants: a comparison of small noncoding RNA requirements in mouse and bovine reproduction.

Authors:  Lauren G Chukrallah; Aditi Badrinath; Kelly Seltzer; Elizabeth M Snyder
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  A proposed selection index for jersey cattle in zimbabwe.

Authors:  Edward Missanjo; Venancio Imbayarwo-Chikosi; Tinyiko Halimani
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2013-03-27

10.  Identification of Loci and Pathways Associated with Heifer Conception Rate in U.S. Holsteins.

Authors:  Justine M Galliou; Jennifer N Kiser; Kayleen F Oliver; Christopher M Seabury; Joao G N Moraes; Gregory W Burns; Thomas E Spencer; Joseph Dalton; Holly L Neibergs
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.