OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that speckle myocardial imaging (SMI) modalities, including longitudinal, radial and circumferential systolic (s) and diastolic (d) myocardial velocity imaging, displacement (D), strain rate (SR) and strain (S), as well as left ventricular (LV) rotation/torsion are sensitive for detecting early myocardial dysfunction in isolated LV non-compaction (iLVNC). DESIGN AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with iLVNC diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance (15) or echocardiography (5) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: ejection fraction (EF)>50% (n=10) and EF<or=50% (n=10). Standard measures of systolic and diastolic function including pulsed wave tissue Doppler Imaging (PWTDI) were obtained. Longitudinal, radial and circumferential SMI, and LV rotation/torsion were compared with values for 20 age/sex-matched controls. EF, PWTDI E', E/E' and all of the SMI modalities were significantly abnormal for patients with EF<or=50% compared with controls. In contrast, EF and PWTDI E', E/E' were not significantly different between controls and patients with iLVNC (EF>50%). However, SMI-derived longitudinal sS, sSR, sD and radial sS, as well as LV rotation/torsion values, were all reduced in iLVNC (EF>50%) compared with controls. Measurements with the highest discriminating power between iLVNC (EF>50%) and controls were longitudinal sS mean of the six apical segments (area under the curve (AUC)=0.94), sS global average (AUC=0.94), LV rotation apical mean (AUC=0.94); LV torsion (AUC=0.93) LV torsion rate (AUC=0.94). CONCLUSIONS: LV SMI values are reduced in patients with iLVNC, even those with normal EF and PWTDI. The most accurate SMI modalities to discriminate between patients and controls are longitudinal sS mean of the six apical segments, LV apical rotation or LV torsion rate.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that speckle myocardial imaging (SMI) modalities, including longitudinal, radial and circumferential systolic (s) and diastolic (d) myocardial velocity imaging, displacement (D), strain rate (SR) and strain (S), as well as left ventricular (LV) rotation/torsion are sensitive for detecting early myocardial dysfunction in isolated LV non-compaction (iLVNC). DESIGN AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with iLVNC diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance (15) or echocardiography (5) were included. Patients were divided into two groups: ejection fraction (EF)>50% (n=10) and EF<or=50% (n=10). Standard measures of systolic and diastolic function including pulsed wave tissue Doppler Imaging (PWTDI) were obtained. Longitudinal, radial and circumferential SMI, and LV rotation/torsion were compared with values for 20 age/sex-matched controls. EF, PWTDI E', E/E' and all of the SMI modalities were significantly abnormal for patients with EF<or=50% compared with controls. In contrast, EF and PWTDI E', E/E' were not significantly different between controls and patients with iLVNC (EF>50%). However, SMI-derived longitudinal sS, sSR, sD and radial sS, as well as LV rotation/torsion values, were all reduced in iLVNC (EF>50%) compared with controls. Measurements with the highest discriminating power between iLVNC (EF>50%) and controls were longitudinal sS mean of the six apical segments (area under the curve (AUC)=0.94), sS global average (AUC=0.94), LV rotation apical mean (AUC=0.94); LV torsion (AUC=0.93) LV torsion rate (AUC=0.94). CONCLUSIONS: LV SMI values are reduced in patients with iLVNC, even those with normal EF and PWTDI. The most accurate SMI modalities to discriminate between patients and controls are longitudinal sS mean of the six apical segments, LV apical rotation or LV torsion rate.
Authors: Marina Leitman; Peter Lysyansky; Stanislav Sidenko; Vladimir Shir; Eli Peleg; Michal Binenbaum; Edo Kaluski; Ricardo Krakover; Zvi Vered Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Ross T Murphy; Rajesh Thaman; Juan Gimeno Blanes; Deirdre Ward; Elias Sevdalis; Efi Papra; Anatoli Kiotsekoglou; Anatoli Kiotsekolglou; Maria T Tome; Denis Pellerin; William J McKenna; Perry M Elliott Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-11-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Steffen E Petersen; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Frank Wiesmann; Matthew D Robson; Jane M Francis; Robert H Anderson; Hugh Watkins; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C Lofiego; E Biagini; F Pasquale; M Ferlito; G Rocchi; E Perugini; L Bacchi-Reggiani; G Boriani; O Leone; K Caliskan; F J ten Cate; F M Picchio; A Branzi; C Rapezzi Journal: Heart Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: M Kowalski; T Kukulski; F Jamal; J D'hooge; F Weidemann; F Rademakers; B Bijnens; L Hatle; G R Sutherland Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Robyn L McClelland; Filip Zemrak; Gabriella Captur; W Gregory Hundley; Chia-Ying Liu; James C Moon; Steffen E Petersen; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 11.105