Literature DB >> 19966103

Midterm outcomes after meniscal allograft transplantation: comparison of cases with extrusion versus without extrusion.

Dae-Hee Lee1, Sang-Beom Kim, Tae-Ho Kim, Eun-Jong Cha, Seong-Il Bin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although graft extrusion is of concern after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), the correlation between extrusion and clinicoradiological outcomes remains unclear. Hypothesis Patients with graft extrusion after MAT have worse clinical outcomes and greater arthritic change than those without graft extrusion. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent MAT between 1999 and 2004. Grafts were classified as either nonextruded (<3 mm) or extruded (>or=3 mm) according to 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 33.5 years (range, 17-43 years), and the mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 3.5-8.3 years). The Lysholm score was used to evaluate knee function. In addition, preoperative and postoperative (final follow-up) measurements were taken to determine the absolute and relative (affected side/normal side) joint space width (JSW) on a standing 45 degrees flexion posteroanterior view.
RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging at 1 year showed the mean graft subluxation was 3.03 +/- 0.872 mm across all patients. Twenty-six knees (60%) were classified as nonextruded and 17 (40%) as extruded. No statistical difference was found between these 2 groups regarding Lysholm score improvement after MAT. Overall, absolute and relative JSWs were slightly narrower postoperatively compared with preoperatively across all patients (mean absolute difference, 0.283 mm; mean relative difference; 4.79%; P <.001). However, extruded and nonextruded knees were similar in terms of absolute (P = .764) and relative (P = .482) JSW after MAT. The amount of extrusion did not correlate with Lysholm score or the relative difference between preoperative and postoperative JSW across all patients or in either group.
CONCLUSION: Joint space width was slightly narrower after MAT. Extrusion had no effect on 5-year clinical or radiological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966103     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509346399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Width is a more important predictor in graft extrusion than length using plain radiographic sizing in lateral meniscal transplantation.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Jong-Won Chung; Jong-Min Kim; Kyung-Ah Kim; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 1: systematic review of graft biology, graft shrinkage, graft extrusion, graft sizing, and graft fixation.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Dean C Taylor; Brian Rill; Terrence Lock; Vasilius Moutzouros; Patricia Kolowich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Meniscal allograft subluxations are not associated with preoperative native meniscal subluxations.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Jae Hyan Kim; Eic Ju Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Meniscal extrusion is positively correlated with the anatomical position changes of the meniscal anterior and posterior horns, following medial meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Nam-Ki Kim; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Bum-Sik Lee; Chang-Rack Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A systematic review of the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative meniscus transplant extrusion.

Authors:  Frank R Noyes; Sue D Barber-Westin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Is meniscal allograft transplantation chondroprotective? A systematic review of radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Nick A Smith; Benjamin Parkinson; Charles E Hutchinson; Matthew L Costa; Tim Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Outcome of meniscal allograft transplantation related to articular cartilage status: advanced chondral damage should not be a contraindication.

Authors:  P J Kempshall; B Parkinson; M Thomas; C Robb; H Standell; A Getgood; T Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials.

Authors:  Mohamed Elattar; Aad Dhollander; René Verdonk; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The tips and pitfalls of meniscus allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Sung Rak Lee; Jin Goo Kim; Sang Wook Nam
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-03

10.  In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Soft Tissue Fixation.

Authors:  Luca Macchiarola; Stefano Di Paolo; Alberto Grassi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Ilaria Cucurnia; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.