Literature DB >> 19966100

An in vitro analysis of an anatomical medial knee reconstruction.

Benjamin R Coobs1, Coen A Wijdicks, Bryan M Armitage, Stanislav I Spiridonov, Benjamin D Westerhaus, Steinar Johansen, Lars Engebretsen, Robert F Laprade.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An anatomical medial knee reconstruction has not been described in the literature. HYPOTHESIS: Knee stability and ligamentous load distribution would be restored to the native state with an anatomical medial knee reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten nonpaired cadaveric knees were tested in the intact, superficial medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament-sectioned, and anatomically reconstructed states. Each knee was tested at 0 degrees , 20 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion with a 10-N.m valgus load, 5-N.m external and internal rotation torques, and 88-N anterior and posterior drawer loads. A 6 degrees of freedom electromagnetic motion tracking system measured angulation and displacement changes of the tibia with respect to the femur. Buckle transducers measured the loads on the intact and reconstructed proximal and distal divisions of the superficial medial collateral ligament and the posterior oblique ligament.
RESULTS: A significant increase was found in valgus angulation and external rotation after sectioning the medial knee structures at all tested knee flexion angles. This was restored after an anatomical medial knee reconstruction. The authors also found a significant increase in internal rotation at 0 degrees , 20 degrees , 30 degrees , and 60 degrees of knee flexion after sectioning the medial knee structures, which was restored after the reconstruction. A significant increase in anterior translation was observed after sectioning the medial knee structures at 20 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion. This increase in anterior translation was restored following the reconstruction at 20 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion, but was not restored at 60 degrees and 90 degrees . A small, but significant, increase in posterior translation was found after sectioning the medial knee structures at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion, but this was not restored after the reconstruction. Overall, there were no clinically important differences in observed load on the ligaments when comparing the intact with the reconstructed states for valgus, external and internal rotation, and anterior and posterior drawer loads. Conclusion An anatomical medial knee reconstruction restores near-normal stability to a knee with a complete superficial medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament injury, while avoiding overconstraint of the reconstructed ligament grafts. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This anatomical medial knee reconstruction technique provides native stability and ligament load distribution in patients with chronic or severe acute medial knee injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966100     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509347996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen; Coen A Wijdicks; Colin J Anderson; Benjamin Westerhaus; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Gender differences in tibio-femoral kinematics and quadriceps muscle force during weight-bearing knee flexion in vitro.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Sartorial branch of the saphenous nerve in relation to a medial knee ligament repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Coen A Wijdicks; Benjamin D Westerhaus; Emily J Brand; Steinar Johansen; Lars Engebretsen; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Surgical management of grade 3 medial knee injuries combined with cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Hideyuki Koga; Takeshi Muneta; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Young-Jin Ju; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Anteromedial rotatory laxity.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  How to avoid collision between PCL and MCL femoral tunnels during a simultaneous reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Emanuele Grassedonio; Michele Lauria; Massimo Midiri; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  POST OPERATIVE REHABILITATION OF GRADE III MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT INJURIES: EVIDENCE BASED REHABILITATION AND RETURN TO PLAY.

Authors:  Catherine A Logan; Luke T O'Brien; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 10.  Treatment of medial and posteromedial knee instability: indications, techniques, and review of the results.

Authors:  D E Bonasia; M Bruzzone; F Dettoni; A Marmotti; D Blonna; F Castoldi; F Gasparetto; D D'Elicio; G Collo; R Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.