Literature DB >> 19966079

Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies: impact on patients, health care providers, and health systems.

Rita Shane1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the impetus for and evolution, components, and potential impact on patients, health care providers, and health systems of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for managing known or potential serious drug risks.
SUMMARY: A 2006 report from the Institute of Medicine criticizing FDA for drug withdrawals due to safety problems provided the impetus for FDA to enhance postmarketing surveillance and to require REMS for medications with actual or potential safety concerns. Components of REMS may include medication guides, patient package inserts, communication plans for health care providers, and elements to ensure safe use (e.g., special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain circumstances, special monitoring, use of patient registries). Recent increases in the number of drugs with REMS requirements, MedWatch alerts, and the development of the new Sentinel Initiative reflect FDA's commitment to drug safety. Patients may be overwhelmed by information about drugs with REMS requirements, which could deter the use of potentially beneficial therapies. Pharmacists can help patients weigh the risks and benefits of drug therapy. Pharmacists, other health care providers, and health systems may find REMS requirements challenging, but FDA is cognizant of the need to balance the goals of ensuring drug safety and providing patient access to drugs without placing an undue burden on the health system.
CONCLUSION: The goal of improving drug safety is sought by the FDA, patients, health care providers, and health systems alike. Collaboration among health care providers may provide efficiencies in meeting FDA REMS requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966079     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Registries, research, and regrets: is the FDA's post-marketing REMS process not adequately protecting patients?

Authors:  Norman J Kachuck
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 2.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Risk minimization activities of centrally authorized products in the EU: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Inge M Zomerdijk; Fakhredin A Sayed-Tabatabaei; Gianluca Trifirò; Stella C F Blackburn; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Sabine M J M Straus
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  US Food and Drug Administration's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for extended-release and long-acting opioids: pros and cons, and a European perspective.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; David Craig; Antonello Giarratano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey.

Authors:  Lianna Ishihara; Melissa Beck; Sara Travis; Olusegun Akintayo; Neil Brickel
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2015-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.