Literature DB >> 19965884

Biomarker detection in the integration of multiple multi-class genomic studies.

Shuya Lu1, Jia Li, Chi Song, Kui Shen, George C Tseng.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Systematic information integration of multiple-related microarray studies has become an important issue as the technology becomes mature and prevalent in the past decade. The aggregated information provides more robust and accurate biomarker detection. So far, published meta-analysis methods for this purpose mostly consider two-class comparison. Methods for combining multi-class studies and considering expression pattern concordance are rarely explored.
RESULTS: In this article, we develop three integration methods for biomarker detection in multiple multi-class microarray studies: ANOVA-maxP, min-MCC and OW-min-MCC. We first consider a natural extension of combining P-values from the traditional ANOVA model. Since P-values from ANOVA do not guarantee to reflect the concordant expression pattern information across studies, we propose a multi-class correlation (MCC) measure to specifically seek for biomarkers of concordant inter-class patterns across a pair of studies. For both ANOVA and MCC approaches, we use extreme order statistics to identify biomarkers differentially expressed (DE) in all studies (i.e. ANOVA-maxP and min-MCC). The min-MCC method is further extended to identify biomarkers DE in partial studies by incorporating a recently developed optimally weighted (OW) technique (OW-min-MCC). All methods are evaluated by simulation studies and by three meta-analysis applications to multi-tissue mouse metabolism datasets, multi-condition mouse trauma datasets and multi-malignant-condition human prostate cancer datasets. The results show complementary strength of the three methods for different biological purposes. AVAILABILITY: http://www.biostat.pitt.edu/bioinfo/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19965884      PMCID: PMC2815659          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  21 in total

1.  The Stanford Microarray Database.

Authors:  G Sherlock; T Hernandez-Boussard; A Kasarskis; G Binkley; J C Matese; S S Dwight; M Kaloper; S Weng; H Jin; C A Ball; M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein; J M Cherry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects.

Authors:  G C Tseng; M K Oh; L Rohlin; J C Liao; W H Wong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository.

Authors:  Ron Edgar; Michael Domrachev; Alex E Lash
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Approximations for trimmed Fisher procedures in research synthesis.

Authors:  I Olkin; H Saner
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation.

Authors:  Jung Kyoon Choi; Ungsik Yu; Sangsoo Kim; Ook Joon Yoo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Terrence R Barette; Dan Rhodes; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.410

7.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Terrence R Barrette; Mark A Rubin; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Comparison and meta-analysis of microarray data: from the bench to the computer desk.

Authors:  Yves Moreau; Stein Aerts; Bart De Moor; Bart De Strooper; Michal Dabrowski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S M Dhanasekaran; T R Barrette; D Ghosh; R Shah; S Varambally; K Kurachi; K J Pienta; M A Rubin; A M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study.

Authors:  Erin M Conlon; Joon J Song; Anna Liu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  21 in total

1.  Assumption weighting for incorporating heterogeneity into meta-analysis of genomic data.

Authors:  Yihan Li; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  An R package suite for microarray meta-analysis in quality control, differentially expressed gene analysis and pathway enrichment detection.

Authors:  Xingbin Wang; Dongwan D Kang; Kui Shen; Chi Song; Shuya Lu; Lun-Ching Chang; Serena G Liao; Zhiguang Huo; Shaowu Tang; Ying Ding; Naftali Kaminski; Etienne Sibille; Yan Lin; Jia Li; George C Tseng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Transcriptomic response of murine liver to severe injury and hemorrhagic shock: a dual-platform microarray analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca D Edmonds; Yoram Vodovotz; Claudio Lagoa; Joyeeta Dutta-Moscato; Yawching Yang; Mitchell P Fink; Ryan M Levy; Jose M Prince; David J Kaczorowski; George C Tseng; Timothy R Billiar
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Integrative correlation: Properties and relation to canonical correlations.

Authors:  Leslie Cope; Daniel Q Naiman; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.473

5.  Comparison study of microarray meta-analysis methods.

Authors:  Anna Campain; Yee Hwa Yang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Meta-analytic framework for sparse K-means to identify disease subtypes in multiple transcriptomic studies.

Authors:  Zhiguang Huo; Ying Ding; Silvia Liu; Steffi Oesterreich; George Tseng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 7.  Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for microarray meta-analysis.

Authors:  George C Tseng; Debashis Ghosh; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  MetaQC: objective quality control and inclusion/exclusion criteria for genomic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongwan D Kang; Etienne Sibille; Naftali Kaminski; George C Tseng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Detecting disease-associated genes with confounding variable adjustment and the impact on genomic meta-analysis: with application to major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Xingbin Wang; Yan Lin; Chi Song; Etienne Sibille; George C Tseng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  An accurate paired sample test for count data.

Authors:  Thang V Pham; Connie R Jimenez
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.