BACKGROUND: Clinical severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is highly variable, but the immunopathological reason is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to show which antibody parameters are associated with disease severity in GBS patients with serum anti-GM1 IgG antibodies. METHODS: Thirty-four GBS patients with anti-GM(1) IgG antibodies were grouped into two categories according to disease severity at nadir: mild (grades 1-3 by Hughes functional scale, n=13) and severe (grades 4 and 5, n=21). Titre, affinity, fine specificity and cell binding of anti-GM(1) antibodies were obtained and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No differences in antibody titre (GM(1)-ELISA) or affinity were found between the two patient groups. In contrast, the severe group showed a significantly higher frequency (95%, vs 46% in the mild group, p=0.002) of specific (not cross-reacting with GD(1b)) anti-GM(1) antibodies. In addition, the severe group also exhibited a higher antibody binding titre to cellular GM(1). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in fine specificity of antibodies are strong indications that different regions of the GM(1)-oligosaccharide are involved in antibody binding. High titres of specific anti-GM(1) antibody binding to cellular GM(1) can be explained by antigen exposure, that is, GM(1) exposes or forms mainly epitopes recognised by specific antibodies, and 'hides' those involved in binding of cross-reacting antibodies. Thus, the fine specificity of anti-GM(1) antibodies may influence disease severity by affecting antibody binding to cellular targets. Additionally, since antibody specificity studies are relatively easy to implement, fine specificity could be considered a useful predictor of disease severity.
BACKGROUND: Clinical severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is highly variable, but the immunopathological reason is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to show which antibody parameters are associated with disease severity in GBSpatients with serum anti-GM1 IgG antibodies. METHODS: Thirty-four GBSpatients with anti-GM(1) IgG antibodies were grouped into two categories according to disease severity at nadir: mild (grades 1-3 by Hughes functional scale, n=13) and severe (grades 4 and 5, n=21). Titre, affinity, fine specificity and cell binding of anti-GM(1) antibodies were obtained and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No differences in antibody titre (GM(1)-ELISA) or affinity were found between the two patient groups. In contrast, the severe group showed a significantly higher frequency (95%, vs 46% in the mild group, p=0.002) of specific (not cross-reacting with GD(1b)) anti-GM(1) antibodies. In addition, the severe group also exhibited a higher antibody binding titre to cellular GM(1). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in fine specificity of antibodies are strong indications that different regions of the GM(1)-oligosaccharide are involved in antibody binding. High titres of specific anti-GM(1) antibody binding to cellular GM(1) can be explained by antigen exposure, that is, GM(1) exposes or forms mainly epitopes recognised by specific antibodies, and 'hides' those involved in binding of cross-reacting antibodies. Thus, the fine specificity of anti-GM(1) antibodies may influence disease severity by affecting antibody binding to cellular targets. Additionally, since antibody specificity studies are relatively easy to implement, fine specificity could be considered a useful predictor of disease severity.
Authors: Jocelyn G Labombarde; Meenu R Pillai; Marie Wehenkel; Chun-Yang Lin; Rachael Keating; Scott A Brown; Jeremy Chase Crawford; David C Brice; Ashley H Castellaw; Alexandra H Mandarano; Clifford S Guy; Juan R Mejia; Carlessia D Lewis; Ti-Cheng Chang; Christine M Oshansky; Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby; Mei Yan; Quan-Zhen Li; Tony N Marion; Paul G Thomas; Maureen A McGargill Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 9.995
Authors: Mohammed A El-Bayoumi; Ahmed M El-Refaey; Alaa M Abdelkader; Mohamed M A El-Assmy; Angi A Alwakeel; Hanem M El-Tahan Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Cecilia B Cavazzoni; Vicente B T Bozza; Tostes C V Lucas; Luciana Conde; Bruno Maia; Luka Mesin; Ariën Schiepers; Jonatan Ersching; Romulo L S Neris; Jonas N Conde; Diego R Coelho; Tulio M Lima; Renata G F Alvim; Leda R Castilho; Heitor A de Paula Neto; Ronaldo Mohana-Borges; Iranaia Assunção-Miranda; Alberto Nobrega; Gabriel D Victora; Andre M Vale Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 14.307