A comparison between fractured Xience-like and Palmaz-like stents using a novel computational model.

We developed a novel mathematical model to study the mechanical properties of endovascular stents in their expanded state. The model is based on the one-dimensional theory of slender curved rods. Stent struts are modeled as linearly elastic curved rods that satisfy the kinematic and dynamic contact conditions at the vertices where the struts meet. A Finite Element Method for a numerical computation of its solution was developed and used to study mechanical properties of two commonly used coronary stents (Palmaz-like and Xience-like stent) in their expanded, fractured state. A simple fracture (separation), corresponding to one stent strut being disconnected from one vertex in a stent, was considered. Our results show a drastic difference in the response of the two stents to the physiologically reasonable uniform compression and bending forces. In particular, deformation of a fractured Xience-like stent (with one strut separated from one vertex) is significantly larger than that of a fractured Palmaz-like stent when exposed to uniform compression and bending. This presents conditions which may be a precursor for the clinically observed complications associated with in-stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis of fractured coronary stents.