Literature DB >> 19964579

Robotic lower limb exoskeletons using proportional myoelectric control.

Daniel P Ferris1, Cara L Lewis.   

Abstract

Robotic lower limb exoskeletons have been built for augmenting human performance, assisting with disabilities, studying human physiology, and re-training motor deficiencies. At the University of Michigan Human Neuromechanics Laboratory, we have built pneumatically-powered lower limb exoskeletons for the last two purposes. Most of our prior research has focused on ankle joint exoskeletons because of the large contribution from plantar flexors to the mechanical work performed during gait. One way we control the exoskeletons is with proportional myoelectric control, effectively increasing the strength of the wearer with a physiological mode of control. Healthy human subjects quickly adapt to walking with the robotic ankle exoskeletons, reducing their overall energy expenditure. Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury have demonstrated rapid modification of muscle recruitment patterns with practice walking with the ankle exoskeletons. Evidence suggests that proportional myoelectric control may have distinct advantages over other types of control for robotic exoskeletons in basic science and rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19964579      PMCID: PMC2833282          DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  34 in total

1.  Intramuscular electromyographically controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic hemiplegia.

Authors:  J Chae; Z P Fang; M Walker; S Pourmehdi
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; James H Cauraugh; Heather A Hausenblas
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking.

Authors:  A Gitter; J M Czerniecki; D M DeGroot
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 4.  Myoelectric prostheses: state of the art.

Authors:  R N Scott; P A Parker
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Myoelectric control of prostheses.

Authors:  P A Parker; R N Scott
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1986

Review 6.  A critical review of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment of motor dysfunction in hemiplegia.

Authors:  J Chae; D Yu
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2000

7.  Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle.

Authors:  S L Aaron; R B Stein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1976-02

8.  Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons.

Authors:  Gregory S Sawicki; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  In vivo registration of Achilles tendon forces in man. I. Methodological development.

Authors:  P V Komi; M Salonen; M Järvinen; O Kokko
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 10.  Brain-machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience.

Authors:  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  17 in total

1.  The necessity for effective interaction between basic scientists and rehabilitation clinicians.

Authors:  Richard L Segal; Michael D Lewek; Karen McCulloch; Vicki S Mercer
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Invariant hip moment pattern while walking with a robotic hip exoskeleton.

Authors:  Cara L Lewis; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Transtibial amputee joint motion has increased attractor divergence during walking compared to non-amputee gait.

Authors:  Shane R Wurdeman; Sara A Myers; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Classification of Anticipatory Signals for Grasp and Release from Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Ho Chit Siu; Julie A Shah; Leia A Stirling
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Estimation of quasi-stiffness and propulsive work of the human ankle in the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Kamran Shamaei; Gregory S Sawicki; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimation of quasi-stiffness of the human knee in the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Kamran Shamaei; Gregory S Sawicki; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimation of quasi-stiffness of the human hip in the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Kamran Shamaei; Gregory S Sawicki; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Towards effective non-invasive brain-computer interfaces dedicated to gait rehabilitation systems.

Authors:  Thierry Castermans; Matthieu Duvinage; Guy Cheron; Thierry Dutoit
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2013-12-31

9.  An upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton using proportional myoelectric control.

Authors:  Zhichuan Tang; Kejun Zhang; Shouqian Sun; Zenggui Gao; Lekai Zhang; Zhongliang Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Learning to walk with an adaptive gain proportional myoelectric controller for a robotic ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Koller; Daniel A Jacobs; Daniel P Ferris; C David Remy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.