Literature DB >> 19963601

A new validity measure for a correlation-based fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm.

Mingrui Zhang1, Wei Zhang, Hugues Sicotte, Ping Yang.   

Abstract

One of the major challenges in unsupervised clustering is the lack of consistent means for assessing the quality of clusters. In this paper, we evaluate several validity measures in fuzzy clustering and develop a new measure for a fuzzy c-means algorithm which uses a Pearson correlation in its distance metrics. The measure is designed with within-cluster sum of square, and makes use of fuzzy memberships. In comparing to the existing fuzzy partition coefficient and a fuzzy validity index, this new measure performs consistently across six microarray datasets. The newly developed measure could be used to assess the validity of fuzzy clusters produced by a correlation-based fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19963601      PMCID: PMC2818127          DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  8 in total

1.  Fuzzy C-means method for clustering microarray data.

Authors:  Doulaye Dembélé; Philippe Kastner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: a survey.

Authors:  Sara C Madeira; Arlindo L Oliveira
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle.

Authors:  R J Cho; M J Campbell; E A Winzeler; L Steinmetz; A Conway; L Wodicka; T G Wolfsberg; A E Gabrielian; D Landsman; D J Lockhart; R W Davis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David G Beer; Sharon L R Kardia; Chiang-Ching Huang; Thomas J Giordano; Albert M Levin; David E Misek; Lin Lin; Guoan Chen; Tarek G Gharib; Dafydd G Thomas; Michelle L Lizyness; Rork Kuick; Satoru Hayasaka; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer; Samir Hanash
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Gene expression-based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study.

Authors:  Kerby Shedden; Jeremy M G Taylor; Steven A Enkemann; Ming-Sound Tsao; Timothy J Yeatman; William L Gerald; Steven Eschrich; Igor Jurisica; Thomas J Giordano; David E Misek; Andrew C Chang; Chang Qi Zhu; Daniel Strumpf; Samir Hanash; Frances A Shepherd; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Katsuhiko Naoki; Nathan Pennell; Barbara Weir; Roel Verhaak; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Todd Golub; Michael Gruidl; Anupama Sharma; Janos Szoke; Maureen Zakowski; Valerie Rusch; Mark Kris; Agnes Viale; Noriko Motoi; William Travis; Barbara Conley; Venkatraman E Seshan; Matthew Meyerson; Rork Kuick; Kevin K Dobbin; Tracy Lively; James W Jacobson; David G Beer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Exploring the conditional coregulation of yeast gene expression through fuzzy k-means clustering.

Authors:  Audrey P Gasch; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Computational cluster validation for microarray data analysis: experimental assessment of Clest, Consensus Clustering, Figure of Merit, Gap Statistics and Model Explorer.

Authors:  Raffaele Giancarlo; Davide Scaturro; Filippo Utro
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Self-Adaptive Fuzzy c-Means Algorithm for Determining the Optimal Number of Clusters.

Authors:  Min Ren; Peiyu Liu; Zhihao Wang; Jing Yi
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.