OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' experiences when diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). METHODS: The study was based on in-depth interviews with ten patients, previously diagnosed with epilepsy and treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) whose seizures were subsequently defined as PNES. The empirical material was analyzed by systematic text condensing strategies within the interpretative tradition. RESULTS: Switch in diagnosis was demanding, both cognitively and emotionally. The patients had difficulty understanding the diagnosis. When the cause of the seizures was unclear, this resulted in feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, a need for re-evaluation of self-understanding, and increased levels of patient stress. The patients felt that with the change in diagnosis, responsibility was transferred from the health authorities to themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The mode of communicating the PNES diagnosis may be decisive for the patients' treatment motivation and ability to cope with the disorder. In order to avoid the patients feeling that they have been abandoned with a difficult diagnosis, close cooperation between neurologists and psychiatrists is essential. Copyright 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' experiences when diagnosed with psychogenic non-epilepticseizures (PNES). METHODS: The study was based on in-depth interviews with ten patients, previously diagnosed with epilepsy and treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) whose seizures were subsequently defined as PNES. The empirical material was analyzed by systematic text condensing strategies within the interpretative tradition. RESULTS: Switch in diagnosis was demanding, both cognitively and emotionally. The patients had difficulty understanding the diagnosis. When the cause of the seizures was unclear, this resulted in feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, a need for re-evaluation of self-understanding, and increased levels of patient stress. The patients felt that with the change in diagnosis, responsibility was transferred from the health authorities to themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The mode of communicating the PNES diagnosis may be decisive for the patients' treatment motivation and ability to cope with the disorder. In order to avoid the patients feeling that they have been abandoned with a difficult diagnosis, close cooperation between neurologists and psychiatrists is essential. Copyright 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Laura H Goldstein; Emily J Robinson; Izabela Pilecka; Iain Perdue; Iris Mosweu; Julie Read; Harriet Jordan; Matthew Wilkinson; Gregg Rawlings; Sarah J Feehan; Hannah Callaghan; Elana Day; James Purnell; Maria Baldellou Lopez; Alice Brockington; Christine Burness; Norman A Poole; Carole Eastwood; Michele Moore; John Dc Mellers; Jon Stone; Alan Carson; Nick Medford; Markus Reuber; Paul McCrone; Joanna Murray; Mark P Richardson; Sabine Landau; Trudie Chalder Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Anne S Hansen; Charlotte U Rask; Maria Rodrigo-Domingo; Sofie G Pristed; Jakob Christensen; René E Nielsen Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Kurt Fritzsche; Kathrin Baumann; Katrin Götz-Trabert; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 5.594