Literature DB >> 19963344

Modification of the upper limb functional index to a three-point response improves clinimetric properties.

Charles Philip Gabel1, Lori A Michener2, Markus Melloh3, Brendan Burkett4.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Observational two-stage.
INTRODUCTION: To achieve optimal clinimetric properties for outcome measures, both practical and psychometric, ongoing improvements are required. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To evaluate if the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) clinimetric properties are improved by modification to a three-point response option and to verify the factor structure.
METHODS: Stage 1, calibration (n=139) used ULFI dichotomous responses, and stage 2, validation (n=117) used a three-point response option. The clinimetric properties were compared in physical therapy outpatients with the QuickDASH as the reference standard. Repeated measurements were made at two to four weekly intervals.
RESULTS: The ULFI three-point response option improved reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1)=0.98], internal consistency (alpha=0.92), QuickDASH concurrent validity (r=0.86), and responsiveness. Minimal detectable change (90% confidence interval) was 7.9%, and factor structure was unidimensional. Missing responses were <0.5%, and practical characteristics were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced reliability and reduced errors with unchanged practicality demonstrate the ULFI improvements through modification to a three-point response option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Crown Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19963344     DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Ther        ISSN: 0894-1130            Impact factor:   1.950


  11 in total

Review 1.  Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carol A Kennedy; Dorcas E Beaton; Peter Smith; Dwayne Van Eerd; Kenneth Tang; Taucha Inrig; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Denise Linton; Rachel Couban
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of Urdu version of upper limb functional index; a validity and reliability study.

Authors:  Ayesha Arooj; Fareeha Amjad; Fahad Tanveer; Asad Ullah Arslan; Ashfaq Ahmad; Syed Amir Gilani
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Philip C Gabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index.

Authors:  Eda Tonga; Charles Philip Gabel; Sedef Karayazgan; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.

Authors:  Tae-Sung In; Jin-Hwa Jung; Keun-Jo Kim; Cu-Rie Lee; Kyoung-Sim Jung; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-06-07

6.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Psychometric analysis of the questionnaires for the assessment of upper limbs available in their Italian version: a systematic review of the structural and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  Luca Barni; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jose Merchan-Baeza; Marco Freddolini
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Authors:  Derk A van Kampen; W Jaap Willems; Loes W A H van Beers; Rene M Castelein; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Charles P Gabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Charles P Gabel; Paul Bennett
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.