Literature DB >> 19963257

Analysis of urinary function using validated instruments and uroflowmetry after primary and salvage prostate cryoablation.

Masaki Kimura1, Vladimir Mouraviev, Matvey Tsivian, Daniel M Moreira, Janice M Mayes, Thomas J Polascik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in urinary function after cryoablation for clinically localized prostate cancer and to investigate risk factors that predict changes in urinary function after surgery.
METHODS: Among the patients who underwent primary or salvage cryoablation between January 2002 and May 2008, 74 patients (50 primary and 24 salvage) with both a preoperative and postoperative urinary function domain score and uroflowmetry were included in this study. The mean age was 66.8 ± 7.5 years and the mean follow-up period was 42.5 ± 20.3 months. The changes in postoperative urinary function were evaluated on the basis of several categorized groups, including surgical method, preoperative urinary symptoms, and prostate volume.
RESULTS: Of 74 patients, 2 (2.7%) presented with mild stress incontinence after cryoablation. No patient presented with persistent urinary retention or urethral fistula. When comparing postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and bother index scores with preoperative scores, it was found that on average IPSS and bother index recovered 12 and 18 months after cryoablation, respectively, and continued to improve after recovery. Only salvage cryoablation correlated with deteriorating urinary function in a logistic regression model (P = .032). However, it was noted that the patients with preoperative moderate to severe urinary symptoms and larger prostate volume showed improvement of urinary function after cryoablation. No associations were found between worsened urinary function and prostate volume, comorbidities (hypertension, obesity, and diabetes), or sexual function.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation is a minimally invasive surgery for localized prostate cancer. This study is the first to demonstrate the ability of cryoablation in terms of maintaining and potentially improving urinary function using validated instruments and uroflowmetry assessments.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19963257     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Treatment profile and complications associated with cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  C B Roberts; T L Jang; Yu-Hsuan Shao; S Kabadi; D F Moore; G L Lu-Yao
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Scott Delacroix; John F Ward; Louis Pisters
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Longitudinal Comparison of Patient-Level Outcomes and Costs Across Prostate Cancer Treatments With Urinary Problems.

Authors:  Jun Tang; Lixian Zhong; Carly Paoli; Alan Paciorek; Peter Carroll; Leslie Wilson
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.