Literature DB >> 19963237

A population-based assessment of perioperative mortality after nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Claudio Jeldres1, Maxine Sun, Hendrik Isbarn, Giovanni Lughezzani, Lars Budäus, Ahmed Alasker, Shahrohk F Shariat, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Hugues Widmer, Daniel Pharand, Philippe Arjane, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perioperative mortality rates at 90 days (90 dM) after nephroureterectomy (NU) and to devise a model capable of identifying individuals at an elevated 90 dM risk. NU represents the surgical standard of care for patients with invasive, nonmetastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. However, this major abdominal surgery may be associated with a nonnegligible rate of perioperative mortality.
METHODS: We identified 6078 upper-tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with NU from 17 registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, between 1988 and 2006. Stratified analyses quantified 90 dM rates according to age, gender, race, year of diagnosis, tumor location, surgery type, T stage, tumor grade, and lymph node status. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression models identified predictors of 90 dM within the development cohort (n = 3039). The accuracy and calibration of the model were tested in an independent validation cohort (n = 3039).
RESULTS: The overall 90 dM rate was 4.4%. Continuously coded age and T and N stages achieved an independent predictor status in multivariable logistic regression models and represented key variables for prediction of individual 90 dM risk after NU, with 73.4% accuracy. Excellent correlation between predicted and observed 90 dM rates after NU was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale population-based analysis of perioperative mortality after NU, age and T and N stages emerged as the most informative predictor of 90 dM. We recommend the use of this tool in individual decision-making and in informed consent considerations. 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19963237     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  29 in total

1.  [Elective organ and function preservation in ureter and renal pelvis tumors].

Authors:  S Rausch; G Gakis; J Bedke; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A low psoas muscle volume predicts longer hospitalization and cancer recurrence in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sohgo Tsutsumi; Takashi Kawahara; Jun-Ichi Teranishi; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-12

Review 3.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift towards nephron sparing management.

Authors:  Julia V Fiuk; Brad F Schwartz
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

4.  Patient and disease factors predictive of adverse perioperative outcomes after nephrectomy.

Authors:  J M Henderson; D Pitcher; R Steenkamp; S Fowler; F X Keeley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Impact of micropapillary histological variant on survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Pierre Colin; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alexandre de La Taille; Eva Comperat; Marc Zerbib; François Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau; Antoine Valeri; Alain Ruffion; Laurent Guy; Stéphane Droupy; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Biphasic malignant tumours of the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  L Max Almond; Adrian T Warfield; Anant Desai; David Gourevitch; Samuel J Ford
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Harun Fajkovic; Eugene K Cha; Evanguelos Xylinas; Michael Rink; Armin Pycha; Christian Seitz; Christian Bolenz; Allison Dunning; Giacomo Novara; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D Raman; Thomas J Walton; Shiro Baba; Joaquin Carballido; Wolfgang Otto; Francesco Montorsi; Yair Lotan; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Karim Bensalah; Richard Zigeuner; Douglas S Scherr; Guru Sonpavde; Morgan Roupret; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Multiple carcinosarcomas of the kidney: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Hakan Ozturk
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-05

9.  Oncologic outcomes and prognostic impact of urothelial recurrences in patients undergoing segmental and total ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jose A Pedrosa; Timothy A Masterson; Kevin R Rice; Hristos Z Kaimakliotis; M Francesca Monn; Richard Bihrle; Michael O Koch; Ronald S Boris
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  [Organ preservation in cancer of the upper urinary tract].

Authors:  F Vom Dorp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.