BACKGROUND: The benefit of liver transplantation relative to initial degree of underlying liver disease and time on the waiting list remains poorly defined. We sought to examine the survival benefit attributable to liver transplantation across a wide range of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. METHODS: The study population included patients with end-stage liver disease enlisted in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between 2001 and 2005. Survival and hazard function for enlisted and transplanted patients were estimated using parametric and nonparametric methods. MELD score was utilized to account for underlying liver disease. RESULTS: Of 1,130 eligible patients, 520 (46.0%) were transplanted, 266 (23.5%) died on the waiting list, 141 (12.5%) were excluded from the waiting list, and 203 (18.0%) remained enlisted and were awaiting transplantation at the time of last observation. At 1 year after transplantation, a MELD score of 15 represented a transition point in terms of overall survival benefit (MELD 10, 90% vs 83%; MELD 15, 81% vs 80%; MELD 20, 63% vs 78%; MELD 25, 42% vs 74%; MELD 30, 21% vs71%; enlisted vs transplant patients, respectively). MELD scores at which transplantation seemed to be beneficial relative to the amount of follow-up time was MELD 23, 17, 15, and 12 at 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively, from time of transplantation/enlistment. CONCLUSION: Although patients with greater MELD scores enjoy a pronounced and early benefit from transplantation, patients with lesser MELD scores do gain from transplantation, although a greater period of time is needed to realize the survival benefit. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The benefit of liver transplantation relative to initial degree of underlying liver disease and time on the waiting list remains poorly defined. We sought to examine the survival benefit attributable to liver transplantation across a wide range of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. METHODS: The study population included patients with end-stage liver disease enlisted in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between 2001 and 2005. Survival and hazard function for enlisted and transplanted patients were estimated using parametric and nonparametric methods. MELD score was utilized to account for underlying liver disease. RESULTS: Of 1,130 eligible patients, 520 (46.0%) were transplanted, 266 (23.5%) died on the waiting list, 141 (12.5%) were excluded from the waiting list, and 203 (18.0%) remained enlisted and were awaiting transplantation at the time of last observation. At 1 year after transplantation, a MELD score of 15 represented a transition point in terms of overall survival benefit (MELD 10, 90% vs 83%; MELD 15, 81% vs 80%; MELD 20, 63% vs 78%; MELD 25, 42% vs 74%; MELD 30, 21% vs71%; enlisted vs transplant patients, respectively). MELD scores at which transplantation seemed to be beneficial relative to the amount of follow-up time was MELD 23, 17, 15, and 12 at 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively, from time of transplantation/enlistment. CONCLUSION: Although patients with greater MELD scores enjoy a pronounced and early benefit from transplantation, patients with lesser MELD scores do gain from transplantation, although a greater period of time is needed to realize the survival benefit. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Xun Luo; Joseph Leanza; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Christine E Haugen; Sommer E Gentry; Shane E Ottmann; Dorry L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Lisiane Pruinelli; György J Simon; Karen A Monsen; Timothy Pruett; Cynthia R Gross; David M Radosevich; Bonnie L Westra Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Michał Grąt; Jan Stypułkowski; Waldemar Patkowski; Karolina M Wronka; Emil Bik; Maciej Krasnodębski; Łukasz Masior; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Michał Wasilewicz; Karolina Grąt; Marek Krawczyk; Krzysztof Zieniewicz Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 5.344