| Literature DB >> 19961680 |
Jean E Limongi1, Fabíola C da Costa, Rogério M C Pinto, Renata C de Oliveira, Camila Bragagnolo, Elba R S Lemos, Márcia B C de Paula, Adalberto A Pajuaba Neto, Marcelo S Ferreira.
Abstract
A cross-sectional serosurvey was conducted to assess the proportion of persons exposed to hantaviruses in a virus-endemic area of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Findings of this study suggested the presence of > or =1 hantaviruses circulating in this region causing hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, mild disease, or asymptomatic infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19961680 PMCID: PMC3044518 DOI: 10.3201/eid1512.090229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
FigureA) Location of the study area in Brazil (box). B) Detail of study area showing municipalities.
Relationship between independent variables and antibody to hantaviruses in the municipality of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006
| Variable | Rural | Periurban | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. antibody positive (no. tested) | p value* | No. antibody positive (no. tested) | p value* | ||
| Sex | |||||
| M | 8 (130) | 0.03 | 1 (84) | 0.44 | |
| F | 0 (70) |
|
| 3 (116) |
|
| Age, y | |||||
| 12–39 | 0 (82) | 0.01 | 0 (112) | 0.04 | |
| >39 | 8 (118) |
|
| 4 (88) |
|
| Risk activity or labor† | |||||
| No activity | 0 (79) | 0.02 | 2 (92) | 0.63 | |
| With activity | 8 (121) |
|
| 2 (108) |
|
| Exposure to rodents | |||||
| Yes | 8 (168) | 0.24 | 3 (152) | 0.67 | |
| No | 0 (32) | 1 (48) | |||
*Determined by using 2-tailed Fisher exact test. †Clearing land, farming, working in pastures or cellars, or cleaning sheds barns, or other outbuildings.
Incidence of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and hantavirus antibody prevalence in the municipality of Uberlândia, Brazil, according to geographic area, 2006*
| Variable | Area | p value† | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | Rural | Periurban | |||
| Disease | |||||
| Cases‡ | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0.24 | 1.92 (0.63–5.90) |
| Population | 71,122 | 17,406 | 53,716§ | ||
| Cumulative incidence, 1998–2005 (×104) | 1.83 | 2.87 | 1.50 |
|
|
| Infection | |||||
| Antibody positive | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0.38 | 0.49 (0.14–1.65) |
| Sample | 400 | 200 | 200 | ||
| Prevalence, % (95% CI)† | 3.0 (1.3–4.7) | 4.0 (1.3–6.7) | 2.0 (0.1–3.9) | ||
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †Rural versus periurban. Determined by using 2-tailed Fisher exact or binomial tests for 2 proportions. ‡Limongi et al. (). §Total population of the southern part of the periurban area.